THE KILLING SCREENS:
MEDIA AND THE CULTURE OF VIOLENCE.
INTERVIEWS DR. GEORGE GERBNER, PH.D,
WITH JEAN KILBOURNE, PH.D.
VIOLENCE? WHY SO MUCH?
NO IMPACT BIG IMPACT?
WE DON'T WANT IT WE DO WANT IT! CENSORSHIP?
We can not understand TV without understanding where it comes from, who
produces it and why. We can not understand TV without understanding that a world
on television is often not like the world we live in. To understand television
you must understand why we see so much gratuitous violence even though it is not
very popular with many audience members? We can not understand television unless
we understand how a global marketing imperative influence the extent to which we
are more likely to see stories of power and violence. To understand television
we must understand how a media environments dominated by these stories alters
the way in which we perceive the world?
KEY QUESTION WHICH THIS VIDEO TRIES TO ASK AND ANSWER
- Why is there so much mediated violence?
- What are it's effects?
What can or should be done about it?
Dr. George Gerbner, Dean, Emeritus, at the Annenberg School of Communication
has been the driving force behind the cultural indicators projects which has
assessed the impact of television on society for the last twenty-five years. The
project is aimed at answering questions such as:
- How does the media cultivate our perceptions of the
world?
- How do these perceptions alter the way we think and act?
- What is the key finding of this project?
As the amount of television viewing increases the degree to which a person
believes the real world is like the televisual world increases.
PART I
STORIES OF POWER
I. Does television reflect the world we live in or does TV distort reality?
A. What factors influence why television looks the way it does?
- The Producers Of Television
- The Motives Which Drive The Entertainment Industry
- How Does The Fact That Television Programming Is
Controlled By
- Global Conglomerates Whose Primary Goal Is Selling
- Products And Making Money Influence The Substance Of The
Messages
- Television Communicates?
II. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE PROBLEM (EXISTENCE)
How Long Is The Average Television On? about seven hours a day average
family We Live In One Of The Most Violent Cultures On Earth According to Gerber,
there has never been a time when the amount of violent imagery permeating every
home was greater. This is historically, unprecedented.
How frequent, how repetitive, how ritualistic is violent mediated content?
Frequency of violent acts in prime time about six to eight an hour
(stable over 28 years of content analyzing television programming)
On average there are at least two entertaining murders per night.
Children's Cartoons - incidence of violent acts about 20 to 30 per hour when
you remake a action-adventure film the amount of violence doubles or triples
with each sequel have to increase the dosage in order meet the accelerating need
of the "violence junkie"
- Robo Cop ---32 corpses
- Robo Cop II ---81 corpses
could not count acts of violence because there were two many (a little
Gerbner Humor)
- Deathwish 9 Corpses
- Deathwish II 52 Corpses
- Rambo 62 Corpses
- Rambo III 106 Corpses
- Godfather 12 Corpose
- Godfather I 18 Corpes
- Godfather III 53 Corpes
Teenage Ninja Mutant Turtles the most violent entertainment vehicle ever
produced for young audiences average of 130 violent acts per hour celebrates the
martial arts teaches a sense of obedience to authority
What are the consequences of this type of exposure to television?
II. What socio-demographic factors tends to be associated with heavy
exposure to television?
- lower education
- less opportunity for cultural participation
- lower income persons whose cultural life is monopolized by
television
III. Why Should We Be Concerned About Exposure To Television?
A. Television Has Become A Dominant Means Of Socialization what is one of
the dominant means of socialization?
PARENT-CHILD TALK
what are some of the forms parent-child talk takes? the STORY-children
become part of their culture, learn the rules and norms regarding appropriate
social behavior by listening to their parents, families, and friends tell the
cultures salient stories. the story is one of the dominant communication forms
employed by televised entertainment
B. Who does television displace as agents of socialization?
- Parents
- The School
- The Church
- The Tribe
- The Community
C. What are some of the consequences of being socialized into a televisual
culture what McLuhan once called "Bonanzaland"?
III. What view of reality is offered by television?
A. on television men outnumber women three to one Why are middle-aged white
males over-represented on television? if you want to understand anything about
television-FOLLOW THE MONEY
"NO BUCKS, NO BUCK ROGERS"
by over-represented while males, television is appealing to its best
customers (e.g. television program L.A. Law) the reality presented on television
is, in part, the result of a marketing strategy, and the need to flatter and
depict in a positive light your potential customers
B. How do the characters who are displayed on the screen influence the
substance of the message? influences the type of stories you can tell what type
of story is mostly easily told if your characters are primarily white males in
the prime of life? what are the salient themes?
- power
- conflict
- violence
one reason why violence is a pervasive and troubling aspect of the stories
dominant television, it is believed that these themes most appeal to the
primary cast of characters which dominate prime time television violence often
presented as a vehicle for men to exert power men are the producers of most of
these programs
C. Does The Popularity Of A Television Program Depend On Violence?
Gerber suggests that the most popular programs on television are not
violent (e.g Cheers) and disagrees with the argument that violence is
pervasive because that is what the people want or that the violence is very
popular.
D. Why is violence used as a primary tool in prime time television? Violence
does take much time, nor does it take much creativity, and it can be
inserted into a dull program whenever it begins to drag.
GLOBAL MARKETING IMPERATIVE
MAKE VIOLENCE AN EXCELLENT COMMODITY
Violence travels well across cultural borders and sells well in the global
entertainment market.
VIOLENCE IS A GOOD COMMODITY FOR A GLOBAL MARKET. Most television
programming and films are produced for a global market. Accounts for why Arnold
Schwartzeneger is the number one box office draw in the WORLD. humor is more
culture bound, more difficult to circulate across cultures, so as a movie
producer if my primary goal is to increase revenue by expanding my market than I
want the type of message substance which can be watched by the greatest number
of people
Thus, according to Dr. Gerber violence is an commodity which is interjected
into television and film in order to increase the income potential of an
entertainment vehicle, and consequently gets interjected into our lives ways
that it never has become.
PART TWO
HAPPY VIOLENCE
I. How is contemporary violence different from traditional uses of violence
in traditional b
entertainment vehicles e.g Shakespeare/Fairy Tales.
A. in many traditional vehicles violence and conflict is a legitimate
artistic creation which often depicts the pain, tragedy and destruction
which are the consequences of violence
B. much of the mediated violence today is a cheap industrial product used to
hype dull uncreative programming. and Gerber refers do as "HAPPY VIOLENCE"
II. What is happy violence?
- violence which is entertainment
- violence which is exciting/thrilling
- violence is a viable solution to problems
- violence which has no serious consequences
Last Action Hero
"One of the best things about the film is the sense of fun and good times"
Promotional Spot
Last Action hero
Why does happy violence dominate mediated message content? according to
Gerbner, global marketing imperative is a key factor
PART THREE
ACCELERATING VIOLENCE
I. What kind of perspective does heavy exposure to "happy violence"
cultivate in the perspectives of our children and in ourselves?
What are the consequences of a steady diet of choreographed brutality being
piped into our homes and theaters?
Desensitization
Creates a market for violent entertainment.` Creates a market for violent
entertainment for even what they see on television is not enough, they must have
mediated content which is more graphic producers cash in on this market, in many
respects violence is like an addictive drug, a greater dosage is necessary to
bring about the desired affect- to satisfy this need the needs and
gratifications explanation of audience behaviors suggests that mediated message
content serves different needs and drives for different people and that people
attend to certain types of messages in order to gratify these needs. also
mediated message content of an entertainment vehicle is viewed as the cutting
edge of a global marketing operation which is designed to sell products
- Teenage Ninja Turtle Troll Dolls, Lunchboxes, Swords
- Thematic Content Used To Create Product Identity
- Altercasting - Little Boys Who Eat Chef-boy-ar-dee Pasta
will be like the Teenage Ninja Mutant Turtles
PART FOUR
VIOLENCE IS A SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP
Depictions of violence in any culture are never just the depiction of a
physical act. Stories we tell about violence are always moral tales and lessons
communication always has a frontstage and a backstage, on the frontstage violent
mediated messages may appear to be nothing more than physical acts.
HOWEVER ON THE BACKSTAGE THERE ARE IMPLICIT MESSAGES ABOUT
who can get always with committing violence, who deserves it, who must
suffer identity management it teaches us to see some persons as aggressors it
teaches us to see some persons as victims communication is multi-functional
it communicates or creates identity for those who are portrayed e.g. gender
identity, product identity, racial identity, human identity messages implicitly
define what rules and norms we should follow in our relationships with bothers
What are some fundamental dimensions of relationships?
- Affection
- Inclusion
- Control Or Power
Violence is not a simple action scenario but depicts a social relationship
between aggressors and victims. Power or control is a resource in relationships.
The need for power in a relationship is subject to individual different. Some
people are high control people some people are low control people. Power is
something which is often negotiated and bargained for in a relationships.
Generally, in any relationship relational partners must work out a consensus
about who is going to have power and control in the different domains which
characterize a relationship e.g. decision-making, finances, child-rearing,
leisure time, and so forth.
PART FIVE
VIOLENCE IS A PRISM THROUGH WHICH THE QUESTION OF POWER CAN BE SEEN.
I. How Does Gender Influence The Extent To Which Persons Are Depicted As
A. In General For Every 10 Aggressors There Are 12 Victims
For Every Women Aggressor (Someone Who Can Impose There Will On Others)
There Are Sixteen Female Victims
B. Women are 50% more likely to be victims than aggressors.
C. Minority women are twice as likely to be victims than aggressors.
II. How does the depiction of women as victims influence or alter
perceptions of power in a mixed-sex relationship?
One-Up/One-Down (Dominant-Submissiveness) in one relational control pattern.
When women are more likely to be victims in implicitly reinforces a
one-up-one-down view of relationships with men presented as aggressors in
positions of power and control.
II. How does on learn what constitutes appropriate social role behavior
and/or appropriate gender role behaviors?
- A. Through Interpersonal Interaction With Significant
Others
- B. Through Social Learning (Role Modeling)
- C. Through Social Learning (Para-social Interaction With
Mediated Role Models)
Appropriate role behaviors than can be internalized through direct and para-social
interaction with significant others. Can a person come to see themselves as a
victim and internalize this role through heavy viewing of violent mediated
message content?
Can person see themselves as more vulnerable?
Can person see themselves as having fewer life chances?
Can person see themselves as more dependent on authorities?
Can person see themselves as more controllable?
Gerbner suggests that this is how minorities are cultivated in society?
III. What are the consequences of internalizing the role of victim?
- A. feel it is appropriate to accept their place in society
- B. feel it is appropriate to accept injustice
- C. feel it is appropriate to accept less of theirshare of
resources, including representation
more and more minorities are unwilling to accept this role and increasingly
becomes hostile to the mainstream culture
PART SIX THE LESSONS OF VIOLENCE
I. What are the consequences of heavy exposure to television?
A. heavy viewers come to perceive the real world to be like the televisual
world
IT CULTIVATES OUR PERCEPTIONS OF THE WORLD, HENCE GERBER'S IDEAS HAVE BEEN
LABELED CULTIVATION THEORY
II. What are the consequences if a large number of people come to view the
real world like the televisual world?
A) may influence the political process if you believe that violence is
escalating out of control certain pollical positions advocated by certain
political candidates may be perceived more favorably
B) for certain groups of people heavy exposure may lead to increased
aggression and the perception that violence is a good solution to problems- this
is a serious problem, but this kind of influence typifies or is characteristic
of only a small percentage of people
C) a more widespread effect is the media cultivates our perceptions of a
"mean world" syndrome- heavy viewers of television tend to believe that we live
in a meaner world
THE MORE YOU WATCH THE MORE DANGEROUS YOU THINK THE WORLD IS
II. What are the consequences of the Mean World Syndrome?
- A. project greater degree of danger on to the world
- B. greater insecurity
- C. desensitization - more insensitive to violence because
you tend to believe that violence is the norm in the outside
THE MORE YOU WATCH THE MORE THREATENED YOU FEEL
- D. more insecure, anxious, and angry at the brutality you
see around you may make you more dependent on the persons who say they will
protect you, more likely you will demand protection and even approve
repression, more receptive to anything you perceive will enhance your sense of
security.
- E. may be more easy to politically exploit these
people-political campaigns, war on drugs, war on crime
F. leads to a kind of undeclared civil war in our cities,
Thus, the primary corrosive effects of growing up in a culture inundated
with violent imagery are:
- desensitization;
- sense of frustration and anger which is exploitable in
many ways; and
- for people who have little participation in the culture or
means of gaining status or attention a sense of aggression.
PART SEVEN
CITIZENSHIP IN THE CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
What can be done?
redefine the debate - redefinition - no primarily a question or censorship
vs free speech dangerous and misleading to think about the debate in terms of
censorship vs free speech framers of the constitution saw government at the only
public authority capable of influencing cultural policy e.g freedom of speech,
press, religion and thus, were quite sensitive to the fact that it was
government that might infringe on these fundamental rights today we have another
government, another public authority which can influence cultural life and this
is the large transnational corporation e.g. Colombia Pictures, Screen Gems,
MGM/UA-authoritative decision-making in many areas of public affairs-
according to Gerbner they can use the First Amendment as a shield and a
privilege to establish a monopoly over cultural production, by which they claim
the freedom to censor everyone else
"Censorship is censorship by any other name."
Television producer
"If we don't watch out we are going to be forced to produced television
which does not display our world realistically, and I don't want to be a part of
that medium"
Gerber would argue that existing television programming does not portray our
world realistically. we are in a situation where we have reached a position in
our culture where a handful of people, the "ministers of culture" in Gerbner's
words to determine what programming our culture will be exposed to-these
ministers of culture are the network presidents, the heads of entertainment and
programming and so forth
CONTROL OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMING IS OUT OF CONTROL OF DEMOCRATIC DECISION-
MAKING
This is a situation in which we have never had to cope, and it is now a
situation in which we must cope with. The key question for Gerbner, is how do we
cope?
B. recognize the problem - the problem is not censorship by government but
censorship by transnational corporations who indirectly influence the content of
television-those corporations which monopolize the television market
C. rather than censoring and closing down the existing market perhaps we
need to open up the market, more participation in cultural production
II. WE NEED A CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT MOVEMENT
A. Need coalition of citizens, educators,k professional artists, media
workers to come together who believe that there should be the opportunity
for more diverse types of television production.
B. Need to build a constituency for media reform-working with
decision-makers and legislators toward the goal of diversifying television
production, freeing and liberating expression and representation from the
constraints of partly the market, partly from the constraints imposed by
concentration of decision-making power in a few hands.
PART SEVEN WHAT PARENTS AND TEACHERS CAN DO?
I. WHAT SHOULD PARENTS DO?
According to Gerbner, parents are trapped in a situation in which very often
the television is the babysitter, this is particularly true of single parent
families and families where both parents work outside the home. If you combine
single parent families and families where both parents work, the remaining
family with one parent working and one parent at home accounts for about 12% of
American families. Becasue statistics suggest that two out of five of you will
likely be divorced, and most of you will be part of dual career families this is
a problem that will likely directly effect you.
If you have tried to care for young children twenty-four hours a day for a
long period of time by yourself, than it is not surprising that television is
used as a babysitter. The simple facts are these: 1) nothing holds the attention
of a young child like television; 2) many tasks that a parent must accomplish
cooking, cleaning, paying the bills, studying, working can not be accomplished
with young children simultaneously demanding your attention.
"TELEVISION SHOULD BE TRUSTED TO BE A BABYSITTER"
CAN WE TRUST TELEVISION TO BE A CO-CAREGIVER TO OUR CHILDREN?????
Why are we one of the few industrialized countries who do not have quality
children's programming in prime time at all?
II. WHAT CAN PARENTS DO?
A. Television should not be used as a reward or a punishment.
Why should television not be used as reward or punishment?
1). Teaches indiscriminate viewing?
If television is part of a behavior modification program with children, it
teaches children that the TV is something that can be turned on and off
depending on their behavior, and regardless of the type of programming that is
being broadcast.
It teaches children that it is not what you watch that is important but how
much you watch.
2). Encourage Selective Viewing Is The Primary Goal Of Teaching Children To
Be Competent Television Watchers.
C. Parents Should Participate In Their Children's World
Why Should Parents Participate In Their Child's Viewing
1) The parents who comments on a television program they have never seen
losses credibility with their children
2) Competence depends on knowledge skill and motivation.
Parents need knowledge of the programs their children view in order to
have a basis for argument in order to enable them to express their perspective
or opinion
3) In order to introduce your children to alternative perspective, an
alternative ways of looking at the world, not just as a means of parental
control
Competent communicators are skilled at perspective-taking-the ability to
cognitively construct the perspective of other people and to make judgments
about how their perspective is similar to and different from your own. Research
strongly suggests that parents who are competent communicators have children who
are competent communicators. Parents are primary agents of socialization, and
are responsible for introducing children to a diversity of perspectives, and
this knowledge slowly enhances the child's skill as perspective-taking.
If a child's understand of the world is shaped only by the perspective of
television, what kind of understanding and what kind of child are you likely to
have?
D. Challenge TV's Power With Alternatives
Teach children there is another way of viewing the world than the one that
is expressed on television. There is an alternative way of looking at like other
than they see on television. The most powerful effect of television as a agent
of socialization is the belief that it cultivates in persons the belief that a
televisual reality is reality-when it monopolizes the cultural life of a person
and they remain unaware their are no alternatives.
Just as parents provide their children with vaccines for children diseases
like polio they need to immunize their children against the effects of
television, furnish alternative points of view is one form of immunization.
Because of the powerful effects of television booster shots are needed
through-out a child's life.
Television is an institutions which has it's own agenda, it has it own
purposes, it has it's own agenda, it looks at and illuminates life from a
restricted point of view, and children need to be aware of this and parents must
help them seek out alternatives ways to look at life.
E. Parents Must Insist That Schools Teach Analytical And Critical Viewing
Teach children how to hand this new cultural environment
F. Parents Should Assume Direct and Primary Responsibility
If one does not teach their children to be media literate than they abdicate
their responsibilities as parents. The schools can only do so much. This may not
be another task we want to burden the schools. It seems every social problem
that comes along the schools are told they must assume the responsibility, it
time that parents took a little responsibility. If parents have to spend a
little less time at work, or a little less time recreating, that is fine, that
is what comes with parenthood- responsibility.
PARENTS ARE NOT MERELY PARENTS, THEY ARE NOT MERELY EDUCATORS, THEY ARE
CITIZENS
WHAT THE POINT OF BRINGING UP CHILDREN IN A RELATIVELY HEALTHY DIVERSIFIED
ENVIRONMENT IF YOU BRING THEM UP INTO A CULTURE AND INTO A WORLD THAT IS A
MESS????
You can not just do one and ignore the other. Not only do we have
responsibilities to the families we create, but we have responsibilities to our
community.
WE ARE CITIZENS
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A CITIZEN?
As Bill Moyers reminds us "For Millions Of Americans Today, Representative
Democracy Has Become A Spectator Sport, Americans Are A Permanent Audience
Waiting To Be Amused, They Look On More And More, And Join In Less And Less." To
Turn Things Around That Almost Everyone Takes For Granted Is Going To Take A
Long Time To Change Things That People Take For Granted May Seem Impossible, And
It Might Be, But Look Around The World At All The Things Five Years Ago People
Would Of Said Were Impossible
"If It Seems Impossible, It Simply Means That It Is Probably Worth Doing"
The Possible We Do Immediately, The Impossible Will Take A Little Longer"
"Some people see things as they are and ask why, others dare to dream things
that never were and ask why not?"