Did the presentation contain a graphic designed to
capture attention?
Yes
No
4
Did the presentation contain a graphic designed to establish
relevance?
Yes
No
5
Did the presentation contain a graphic designed to relate with
audience?
Yes
No
6
Did the
presentation contain a thesis sentence which pointed direction to
all main points?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
MESSAGE FORM/STRUCTURE
1
Included a
graphic with first question and answer A.
Yes
No
2
Include a
graphic with first question and answer A and B
Yes
No
3
Included a
graphic with first question and answer A, B, and C.
Yes
No
4
Included a transition
Yes
No
5
Summary
Yes
No
6
Spotlight
Yes
No
7
Forecast
Yes
No
8
Included a
graphic with second question and answer A
Yes
No
9
Include a
graphic with second question and answer A and B
Yes
No
10
Included a
graphic with second question and answer A, B, and C.
Yes
No
11
Include a transition
Yes
No
12
Summary
Yes
No
13
Spotlight
Yes
No
14
Forecast
Yes
No
15
Included a graphic with third question and answer A
Yes
No
16
Include a graphic with third question and answer A and B
Yes
No
17
Included a graphic with third question and answer A, B, and C.
Yes
No
Utlized animated
transitions between slides was effective
Yes
No
Yes
No
MESSAGE
SUBSTANCE
Yes
No
The
content is written clearly and concisely with a logical
progression of ideas and supporting information
Yes
No
Contained 5 or more
quotations from authority
Yes
No
Contained 3
or more quotations?
Yes
No
Did the presentation contain 1 or more quotation?
Yes
No
Did the
presentation contain a chart ot graph?
Yes
No
Did presentation contain graphics which cued audience dialogue?
Yes
No
Use of URL's to take
audience to web sites to develop message
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
NOTES
VIEW
Yes
No
Notes
View-
Substance of presentation translated to "notes view"
Yes
No
Notes
View-Graphic and notes view made presentation intelligible to a
naive reader.
Yes
No
Notes View-Message substance in
notes view full metal jacket.
Yes
No
Message Style - Readability
Were there graphics with too much text?
Yes
No
Background and colors
enhance the readability of text
Yes
No
Background design detracted from main components of graphic
Yes
No
High level of contrast between font and background?
Yes
No
Font- Font size was 28pt of
higher and bold on all text graphics
Yes
No
Font - Utilized
Clear Rather than "Artsy" Fonts
Yes
No
Font- Font varies
appropriately for headings and text
Yes
No
Yes
No
Message Style - Animation, Sounds, Graphics
Used animations and sounds
Yes
No
The graphics, sound and/or
animation assist in presenting an overall theme and make visual
connections that enhance understanding of concept, ideas and
relationships
Yes
No
Avoided graphics, sounds,
and/or animations seem unrelated to the topic/theme and do not
enhance the overall concepts
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Message Style - Visual
Imagery
Used Original
Images
Yes
No
Used Images From Internet
Yes
No
Utilized at
least three instances of work art or reinforce message
Yes
No
Utilized a
significant number of Full Screen Images to enhance impact
Yes
No
Used a few
example of clip art to furnish stimulus variation
Yes
No
Avoided
images which are poorly cropped or the color/resolution is
fuzzy.
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Conclusion
Summarize
-Included Summary of Main Points
Yes
No
Personalized -
Self-Disclosure
Yes
No
Emotionalized - Tapped into Audience Emotions
Yes
No
Finalized - Used Multiple Strategies for Ending Messages
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
GENERAL
5
4
3
2
1
Feedback from Preliminary Drafts Incorporated into Final
Draft
Total number of slides
Total number of full screen
images
Notes View
Presentation intelligible to naive reader/viewer