Chapter 23

A Matter of Perspective

Paaige K. Turner and Robert L. Krizek

 Case Overview

 This case examines the complexities of viewing patient/consumer satisfaction as a single, fixed concept. Metropolitan Medical Group is experiencing declining patient satisfaction and revenues and wants to know why. Mike Taslow, the CEO, hires Betty McDaniel as the new Director of Patient Care to create a seamless experience for patients. Since Betty has worked in a different organizational environment, she spends her first three months observing patient interactions and interviewing staff, doctors, and patients. At the end of three months, Betty suspects that Mike’s question, “Why aren’t patients satisfied?” might be too narrowly focused.

 Learning Objective

 This case illustrates the structural and personal implications of assuming a single interpretation of patient/consumer satisfaction.

 Keywords and Definitions

 Emergent or informal networks—relationships that emerge between and among organizational stakeholders through communication interactions in contrast to formal organizational charts.

 Formal networks—organizational communication channels mandated by the organization and reflected in the organizational chart.

 Hierarchical ordering—the arrangement of system components in complex ways that involve subsystems and suprasystems.

 Information—transfer model of communication–communication is a tool for transferring information from one person or place (a source) to another (a receiver).

 Interdependence—the functioning of one component of a system relying on the other components of that system.

 Network analysis—mapping of the flow of information and relationships among people.

 Patient/consumer satisfaction—a complex process balancing consumer expectations with the perceptions of the service or product in question (Newsome & Wright, 1999).

 Permeability—degree to which the boundaries of a system allow information and materials to flow in and out of that system.

 Task and relational dimensions of communication—messages perform at least two functions: task (the transfer of information) and relational (the defining of the relationship between the sender and the receiver).

 Transactional model of communication—communication is a process whereby senders and receivers interpret the meaning of messages based upon the present situation, their individual experiences, history, and cultural influences.

Obstacles/Challenge

1) To increase patient satisfaction with the goal of reversing declining revenues

2)  Identify factors likely to influence patient satisfaction
        Patient insensitivity due to lack of policies and procedures or inability to follow policy and procedure.
        Entry and admittance policies objectify persons seeking care.
        Excessive wait time. 
        Waiting rooms are not "kid-friendly."
        Patients may have unrealistic expectations
        Patients and staff may have different perceptions of what is appropriate waiting time.
 

Strategies and Challenges

1) Need to develop a satisfaction audit which yields hard data about the factors which influence satisfaction and contribute to dissatisfaction

2) Need to conduct focus groups with clinic staff to generate potential strategies to enhance patient satisfaction.

3) Satisfaction is the congruency between expectations and outcomes.  Need to develop strategies to help
    patients/clients/consumers develop realistic expectations.

 

 Discussion Questions

1. Who are the various stakeholders in this case? From the perspective of each stakeholder, briefly answer the following questions:

       a) What makes a patient’s experience satisfactory or dissatisfactory?

       b) What would a seamless experience look like?

       c) Who is responsible for successful communication?

       d) Where do the stakeholders’ definitions of satisfaction come from?

e) How did these differing perspectives affect the communication during Ms. Dillard’s office visit?

 

2.    Analyze the communication of MMG using systems theory. a) What are the various organizational sub-systems? b) How does the bypassing of formal channels and relying on informal channels affect patient satisfaction? c) How is the staff and physicians’ concept of patient satisfaction reflected in the flow of information; d) How is the staff and physicians’ concept of patient satisfaction reflected in the structural processes of the organization? e) Are the staff and doctors’ perceptions consistent with the patients’ perceptions of satisfaction? f) How have staff and doctor’s interpretations of patients influenced the organization’s handling of patients? g) What systemic communication procedures or practices would you recommend to enhance patient satisfaction?

3.  How might Betty rephrase the question, “Why aren’t patients satisfied?” to reflect what she found?

4 How is a patient different from a consumer? How are they the same? How is speaking with a doctor different from, or similar to, speaking with a service technician at a TV repair shop?

5.  What are the implications of this case study for communication theorists’ understanding of task vs. relational dimensions of communication?

6.  What changes might the organization make to improve patient/consumer satisfaction? What individual or systemic forces might inhibit those changes? What might be some of the unintended consequences of those changes?

7.  What communication theories can health care organizations draw upon to ensure patient satisfaction while addressing declining revenues in the health care field?

 

References and Resources

 
Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review. 9, 428–437.

Cardello, L. L., Ray, E. B., & Pettey, G. R  (1995). The relationship of perceived physician communicator style to patient satisfaction. Communication Reports, 8, 27–37.

Daniels, T. D., Spiker, B. K., & Papa, M. J. (1997) Perspectives on organizational communication (4th ed.). Madison, WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark.

Eisenberg, E. M., & Goodall, H. L. (2001). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint (3rd ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Ellingson, L. L., & Buzzanell, P. M. (1999). Listening to women’s narratives of breast cancer treatment: A feminist approach to patient satisfaction with physician-patient communication. Health Communication, 11, 153–183.

Gibb, J. (1961, September). Defensive communication. Journal of Communication, 141–168.

Goldstein, M. S., Elliott, S. D., & Guccione, A. A. (2000). The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 80, 853–863.

Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71, 104–112.

Lammers, J. C., & Geist, P. (1997). The transformation of caring in the light and shadow of managed care. Health Communication, 9, 45–60.

Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001) Emergence of communication networks. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 440–502). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Monge, P., & Eisenberg, E. (1987). Emergent communication networks: In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 204–342). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Miller, K. (1998). Nurses at the edge of chaos: The application of “new science” concepts to organizational systems. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 112–127.

——. (1999). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Putnam, L. L., & Sorenson, R. L. (1982). Equivocal messages in organizations. Human Communication Research. 8, 114–132.

Stevenson, W. B., & Gilly, M. C. (1991). Information processing and problem solving: The migration of problems through formal positions and networks of ties. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 918–928.

 Ashmos, D. P., & Huber, G.P. (1987) The systems paradigm in organizational theory: Correcting the record and suggesting the future. Academy of Management Review, 12, 607–621.

Atkinson, C. J., & Checkland, P. B. (1988). Extending the metaphor “system.” Human Relations, 41, 709–725.

Backer, D. (2001). Why systems? Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 59–75.

Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112.

Fairhurst, G. T., & Sarr, R. A. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., & Russell, H. M. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Ford, L. A., & Ellis, B. H. (1998). A preliminary analysis of memorable support and nonsupport messages received by nurses in acute care settings. Health Communication, 10, 37–63.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Macmillan: London.

Houston, R. (1999). Self-organizing systems theory: Historical challenges to new sciences. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 119–134.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Krizek, R. L., & Turner, P. K. (2002, November). Patient/customer satisfaction in the health care industry. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, New Orleans.

Lammers, J. C., & Duggan, A. (forthcoming) Organizational Forms of the Provision of Health Care. In K. Miller, T. Thompson, P. Dorsey, & R. Parrott (Eds.), The Handbook of Health Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

Leveque, C., & Poole, M. S. (1999). Systems thinking in organizational communication inquiry. In P. Salem (Ed.), Organizational communication and change (pp. 79–98). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Miller, K. I., Stiff, J. B., & Ellis, B. H. (1988). Communication and empathy as precursors to burnout among human service workers. Communication Monographs, 55, 250–265.

Monge, P. R. (1977). The systems perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 25, 19–29.

Newsome, P. R. H., & Wright, G. H. (1999). A review of patient satisfaction: 1. Concepts of satisfaction. British Dental Journal, 186, 161–165.

Poole, M. S. (1997). A turn of the wheel: The case for a renewal of systems inquiry in organizational communication research. In G. Barnett & L. Thayer (Eds.), Organization-communication: Emerging perspectives V, The renaissance in systems thinking (pp. 47–64). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: The case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.

Seigfried, R. J. (1998). Systems coherence: A method for evolving relationships and measuring system change. Quality Management in Health Care, 7, 29–37.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.

Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Wenberg, J., & Wilmot, W. (1973). The personal communication process. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Wheatley, M. (1992). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Zabava Ford, W. S. (1998). Communicating with customers: Service Approaches, Ethics, and Impact. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.