SOME THOUGHTS ON THE CONCEPT OF FORM

Form is one of the words which helps us understand what is meant when it is said that language is inherently ambiguous. Form could refer to SHAPE or GENERAL STRUCTURE. For example, you could refer to the general form or structure of a book, or you could use the word to refer to the figure of a person, (e.g. he or she has a nice form). Form could refer to ARRANGEMENT OR STYLE (e. g. most important to least important, most exciting to least interesting). Form could define the outside edges and the internal parts of an object or an outline, a picture, a basketball game.  There are always multiples ways to define a concept.

DEFINITION BY TYPE

Form can be used to describe a PARTICULAR KIND, TYPE, OR MODE. For example, there are different modes of discourse, there are different types of mediums, there are different forms of poetry. Mediums of communication can and usually are defined by the dominant form which their messages take (e.g. oral, print, visual, televisual, and computer-mediated). Form could refer to the general goal of a medium or a message )e.g. entertainment, information, persuasion).

Form could refer to a specific type of television programming, because certain types of programming usually have certain qualities or characteristics which define the generic form. For example, the nightly news, a talk show, and a situation comedy could be defined as forms because they are all generally organized, patterned, and/or framed in a similar way.

In this sense a film genre is usually characterized not only by similar message content and themes, but also by similar structures.

To understand the concept of form in mass communication, it might be useful to think of form in terms of two types-general and specific.

At an even more specific level each news story often follows a certain pattern (e.g. anchor leads story, anchor hands off to correspondent, correspondent talks, anchor asks correspondent question, correspondent answers, anchors closes story).

DEFINITION BY COMPONENT PARTS

To understand the form of something we often try to identify its component parts. For example, USA Today is defined by its form, it's component parts are:

A public presentation generally has an introduction, a residual message or main points, and a conclusion.

A drama may have a prologue, a certain number of acts, and a epilogue.

A visual image has form, it is comprised of dots, lines, and shapes (parallelograms (squares/rectangles, circles, and triangles).

DEFINITION BY PROCESS

Form could refer to the process of how we structure messages. For example, in constructing an essay or a public presentation one must give the message form. One must engage in the process of organizing and framing the message (e.g. we may choose to organize a presentation using a problem-solution scheme or a narrative/chronological scheme).

The word could refer to the process of thinking in the sense that people FORM their opinions, in other words, when people perceive information they have to organize it and fit it into the existing cognitive structures in their heads which we all use to process information.

DEFINITION BY NEGATION

The form of a message can be understand by trying to understand that there is a difference between the form of a message and the substance or content of a message.

The content of a message generally denotes a specific concrete statement about the world.

Yet one can understand the meaning of words or groups of words independent of their form.

DEFINITION BY COMPONENT PARTS

For example, USA Today is defined by its form, it's component parts are Nation, Lifestyle, Money, and Sports.

WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MESSAGE FORM AND MESSAGE CONTENT?

The aphorism "the medium is the message" refers to the way in which form can influence content. When Marshall McCluhan said that the "medium is the message" he was perhaps suggesting that the form of the medium determines the content of messages emanating from that particular form.

It is probably more reasonable to say that while the form of the message does not determine message substance, it can and does exert a significant influence on the content of messages which can issue from a particular form.

For example, consider the McDonald's commercial in the Bill Moyers video Consuming Images. Because the message is designed for television, the televisual form and the form that commercials usually take call for a certain type of content.

 Now change the form of the message, from televisual to print, and try to construct the same message content or substance.

Consider the communication medium, smoke signals. The form of this medium would generally preclude having an argument, discussing philosophy, or trying to explain the relationship between form and content. Thus, the form of the medium does not dictate message content in a causal sense, but in many ways, "message designers must follow where the medium leads them."


Just Ask Chris

TAKE me HOME