CONTENTS

The figures from each chapter are available to download as PowerPoint files.

Introduction

Download figures

Part 1: Understanding Internet Consumers

1. Why Consumers Buy Online Download figures
2. Using Technographics® To Target Internet Consumers
Download figures
3. Reaching Early Adopters
Download figures
4. The Battle For The Mainstream Download figures
5. Avoiding The Laggard Trap Download figures

Part 2: Exploiting Internet Business Models

6. The Internet's Impact On Competition Download figures
7. What Makes Internet Business Models So Difficult Download figures
8. Creating Company Value Download figures

Part 3: Defying The Gravity Of The Old Ways Of Doing Business

9. Thriving On Technology Change Download figures
10. Coping With Internet Channel Conflict Download figures
11. Funding, Organization, And Leadership Download figures
12. Conclusion: The Will To Win Download figures

Appendix: Technographics Methodology

Download figures


 
 Forrester
 Register/Login

 Products
 Events
 Full Research List
 Press Resources
 Investor Info
 The Company
 Site Map
 Contact Us
 Help
 Search
 Become A Forrester
 Client
 Affiliate
 Employee
 Get Connected




Applying Technographics®

April 1999
Rob Rubin
William M. Bluestein, Ph.D.

This report describes Forrester's unique Technographics® Segmentation and outlines its value for businesses. Marketers are more likely to succeed if they know consumers' levels of openness to technology. Forrester's Technographics Segmentation is essential in the marketing of any technology-based product or service -- it helps determine target markets and the messages and channels to be used in order to reach those markets.

INTRODUCTION

During the last 18 months, Forrester surveyed more than 250,000 North American households to understand their levels of receptiveness to technology-based products and services. What helps us determine those levels is Forrester's unique Technographics Segmentation: a model designed to categorize consumers based on their attitudes, motivations, and abilities to use or acquire technology.

Our Technographics Segmentation is essential for the business decisions of companies that:

  • Sell to consumers who are in the process of changing their banking, investing, and shopping behavior. Successful firms in these markets can capitalize on the changing role technology plays in customers' lives.
  • Seek to identify fertile new technology markets, such as PC and consumer electronics. Targeting responsive consumers reduces the financial risks associated with bringing new products to market.
  • Must build business plans for new infrastructure, as in the cable and telecommunications industries. Understanding consumer demand for communication and entertainment services is essential to effectively plan for a market rife with change and competition.

This report draws on data from Forrester's Technographics '99 Field Study of nearly 100,000 North American households. The data is weighted to demographically represent the North American population. Statistics based on this data are accurate to ± 1%.



FORRESTER'S TECHNOGRAPHICS SEGMENTATION

Three axes define the Technographics Segmentation: attitude toward technology, income, and primary motivation (see Figure 1). We developed a series of 15 attributes, called the Technographics Scale. Respondents rate those attributes on a scale of 1 to 10, depending on how strongly they agree or disagree with each attribute. Multivariate statistical techniques, such as factor analysis, cluster analysis, and discriminant analysis, generate 10 distinct consumer segments.



IDENTIFY RECEPTIVE CONSUMERS

The Technographics Segmentation identifies who is likely to be the most interested and, consequently, the best prospect for a technology-based offer. This is important because any new technology-related product or service, from Web TV to on-line banking, appeals to some but offers little benefit to others.

Attitude Determines Technology Use
The Technographics Segmentation divides consumers into two major camps: technology optimists and pessimists.

  • Technology optimists embrace the idea that changing their behavior to use or acquire a new technology will make their lives simpler and more enjoyable.
  • People indifferent, anxious, or hostile to technology are categorized as technology pessimists. These consumers show little interest in using technology for needs or desires that can be satisfied through traditional methods.
  • Technology optimists and pessimists can be further split into roughly equal groups by their household income: 1) high-income consumers, with annual household incomes exceeding $40,000 for families or $25,000 for singles; and 2) low-income consumers, with incomes that fall below these cutoffs.

Experience Defines Attitude
The Technographics Segmentation also takes into account consumers' life experiences (see Figure 2).

  • Optimists tend to be younger and better educated and earn higher incomes. These consumers are much more likely to use technology in their education, as well as in their jobs.
  • Pessimists are usually older, with lower education and income, and they are less likely to use a computer at work.



OPTIMISM RULES

Our research shows that technology optimism provides the most important clue in determining the acceptance of a new technology. Optimists are much more likely to use technology for new activities and acquire new technology platforms than are pessimists. Their adoption of technology skews by income -- as a group, high-income optimists dominate new technology use (see Figure 3).

  • High-income optimists are most likely to engage in on-line activities like tracking stock portfolios and shopping. More than half of this group already uses on-line services. More than a quarter conduct product research on-line for purchasing decisions. This group should be the prime target market for eCommerce marketing.
  • Low-income optimists drive growth in the consumer PC market. These consumers are just starting their on-line journey and will begin transacting by 2000.
  • High-income pessimists own technology but do not use it as extensively or passionately as optimists do. Children are often the primary users of technology in high-income pessimists' homes. These households replace their PCs at a slow rate and, compared with the optimists, exhibit less adventurous on-line behavior.
  • Low-income pessimists lag behind in technology adoption and use. Only 20% own PCs; a minuscule 7% are on-line. These consumers enjoy watching TV and do not see the benefits of investing their scarce resources for new technology.



Targeting Technology Optimists
Because technology optimists are the most likely prospects for technology products and services, marketers must clearly identify this group and gear their messages and channels to it. Forrester's extensive field research and predictive database modeling help businesses of different scopes in a variety of industries to:

  • Map the demographic profiles of consumer segments for optimism/pessimism. This is essential for companies that sell products to all segments of the population, such as packaged goods suppliers.
  • Market on-line offerings to customers most likely to change their behavior. This is imperative for companies with large consumer databases, such as airlines and telephone companies. Scoring databases to predict likely technology optimists provides an efficient direct marketing strategy to reach these customers.
  • Target eCommerce initiatives at a local market with the most receptive consumers. This helps on-line start-ups and retailers maximize limited budgets. Ranking metropolitan areas by technology optimism and income gives these businesses an effective overlay to their marketing plans.
  • Build a business case for introducing electronic bill presentment to reduce costs. This should interest utilities and Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) as well as financial institutions. Analysis of their customers by attitude toward technology enables these businesses to project how many of their customers will switch to paying bills and doing transactions on-line.
  • Analyze technology usage of consumers based on their technology attitude. This gives consumer electronics and PC companies an understanding within various consumer segments of the adoption rate of new technologies like DVD players and replacement cycles for existing technologies such as PCs.



CREATE MARKETING MESSAGES

Once receptive consumers have been identified, marketers need to use the Technographics primary motivation axis to develop successful messages.

Motivation Complements Attitude
The Technographics Segmentation distinguishes consumers across three types of primary motivation: career, family, and entertainment. These motivations relate to people's need to feel fulfilled in their lives. For example, career motivation represents the need to get ahead or feel important at work; family motivations are associated with the need to nurture or provide care; entertainment motivations correspond with the need to have fun. The Technographics Segmentation assembles consumers into one of those three motivations, based on consumers' strongest needs.

Needs Drive Consumer Motivations
Fascinating differences emerge when we compare the demographics of consumers in each primary motivation group (Figure 4).

  • Entertainment-motivated consumers are the youngest and least likely to be married. A high percentage have attended college, but not many own homes. Fewer family and household responsibilities allow these consumers to focus on fun.
  • Career-motivated consumers are married and responsible for raising children and paying mortgages. These consumers are driven to get ahead in order to enable a lifestyle they envision for their families and themselves.
  • Family-motivated consumers are the oldest and are the most likely to be married and have grown children. Maturity enables these consumers to keep their priorities in check and be most influenced by their hearth-minded needs.



Use Motivation To Create Message Appeal
The single most effective way to communicate with consumers about a new technology is to match a message with their primary motivation (Figure 5). This section outlines the types of messages that are most likely to attract various consumers according to their motivation.

  • Family-motivated consumers are most receptive to messages about investing in their children's education.

     

    New Age Nurturers with children and PCs are 28% more likely to have purchased children's educational software than other PC owners with children.
  • Career-motivated consumers feel the most pressure to tightly manage their schedules. Products and services that offer greater convenience and save time attract these consumers in droves.

     

    Fast Forwards who have purchased music or books on-line are 23% more likely than other on-line music or book buyers to make their decisions on the basis of convenience.
  • Entertainment-motivated consumers need no excuses to purchase a product purely for their personal enjoyment.

     

    Mouse Potatoes without children are 31% more likely to own video game consoles than other households without children.



Use Motivation To Drive Business Decisions
Knowledge of the best appeals for the right audience empowers business strategies in many industries.

  • Advertising messages that correspond with consumers' motivation should be a priority for technology and consumer electronics manufacturers. After creating the best-appeal messages, marketers must place them in the media outlets that are the most likely to reach the targeted consumers. Analyzing consumers' media habits by primary motivation provides marketers with concrete media strategies.
  • On-line content ensures rewarding experiences when it appeals to consumers' primary motivation. Businesses that must master such content include media companies and traditional brands using the Internet as a new distribution channel, like financial service providers. Understanding the expectations of target consumers enables these marketers to extend their brands on-line.
  • Portals can efficiently reach consumers who gather information to make a purchasing decision, especially for high-ticket items. Airlines, travel and real estate agencies, and automobile and appliance manufacturers will benefit from analyzing the habits of on-line users according to primary motivation, maximizing their budgets and increasing the revenue impact of the Internet.



HOW TO USE TECHNOGRAPHICS

The real value of Technographics depends on a company's ability to apply it in making business decisions. Forrester has developed special tools and established partnerships to help clients use Technographics in the most valuable way.

Enabling Tools

  • The Technographics Scale -- 15 statements respondents rate on a scale of 1 to 10 -- can be incorporated into Technographics clients' proprietary research. This permits our clients to analyze their own research by the three Technographics axes.
  • A focus group screener has been developed for Technographics clients to use in their own focus group research. Clients can recruit respondents based on their Technographics Segment to test marketing messages and conduct usability research.
  • Predictive database modeling with CHAID functions enables clients to score customer databases for technology optimism and other factors. Forrester can develop algorithms for clients by building CHAID functions, using data consistent with the Technographics Field Study databases and clients' customer records, like age, income, or gender.

Partnerships

  • Licensing the Technographics Scale to Mediamark Research (MRI) enables Technographics clients to analyze their research by the Technographics axes. MRI has embedded the Technographics Scale into its semiannual Field Studies.
  • Resampling respondents of Technographics Field Studies is possible by contracting with NPD or Greenfield Research, the Technographics data partners. This feature enables clients to select a sample based on specific Technographics attributes and append a proprietary survey to the Technographics Field Studies.
  • Database enhancement and direct mail campaigns through Experian that are based on Technographics enable clients to analyze their customer databases and target offers to prospect households. Forrester and Experian have partnered to score all U.S. households for Technographics and specific activity and technology usage like PC ownership, on-line subscriptions, electronic commerce, and demand for broadband services in the home.
  • Recruitment and facilitation of Technographics focus groups with Plaza Research provide clients with the highest-quality recruitment and state-of-the-art facilities in 12 metropolitan areas in the United States. Forrester has trained Plaza Research on the proper execution of the Technographics focus group screener, and Plaza Research has programmed the screener into their CATI system.

 http://www.entrepreneur.com/Your_Business/YB_SegArticle/0,1314,271248,00.html
 
 

Print this

E-Commerce Expert Mary Modahl
Read on as this expert explains why you need to be prepared for the new Internet consumer and business models.
By Laura Tiffany
April 17, 2000

 


If there's one tried-and-true statement about the effects of e-commerce on today's business world and consumers, it's that there are no tried-and-true statements. Consumers are finally getting the gist of things and realizing how e-commerce can improve their lives—whether through access to product information, added convenience, lower costs or improved selection. Business models are created and discarded constantly as both up-and-coming and established business race to be the first click for e-commerce consumers.

One of the companies that's been at the forefront of the study of the Internet and e-commerce is technology analysis firm Forrester Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Vice president of research Mary Modahl has culled her 11 years of experience studying the Internet in her recent book, Now or Never: How Companies Must Change Today to Win the Battle for Internet Consumers (HarperBusiness, $27). In it, she shares the knowledge of the dotcom consumer through "technographics," Forrester's new take on demographics as well as where the Internet will lead the business model.

Entrepreneur.com: What is "technographics"?

Mary Modahl: Technographics is basically a way to segment consumers just like psychographics or demographics except that it's custom-made for the Internet economy. It specifically looks at how consumers behave online and particularly what their shopping behavior is.

Entrepreneur.com: In your book, you discuss three main types of technographic groups—the early adopters, the laggards and the mainstreamers. What types of consumers make up these groups? Why are they important?

Modahl: The huge divide among consumers is really around attitudes toward technology. Some consumers are optimists about technology: They like it, they like to learn about it, they don't mind trying something new. Others are very pessimistic about technology, even fearful. This is really the biggest single divide among consumers when it comes to looking at online shopping behavior.

Once you further divide these groups by income, what you find is early adopters tend to be people with higher incomes who like technology. The real laggards tend to be people who have lower incomes and don't like technology. And the mainstream is really composed of two big broad groups: high-income individuals who are uncomfortable with technology and low-income individuals who love technology.

Entrepreneur.com: Why are early adopters important?

Modahl: They're the first market for anybody coming online. And they're the initial target; that's where your first revenues will come from and do come from. I think that in particular, New Age Nurturers, who are family-oriented early adopters, are very important because they tend to be brand trendsetters among the population. What they do tends to hold a lot of credence with the mainstream, and they can really set the trend. So reaching those folks in particular is important.

Entrepreneur.com: What obstacles need to be overcome to attract mainstream groups?

Modahl: For the high-income pessimist, it's really about familiarity. High-income pessimists don't like new stuff so you have to make your Web site and your offerings as familiar as possible for these people who are a little bit uncomfortable about something new. Low-income optimists are seeking ultimate convenience. This is the younger generation. They expect information [instantly] on anything they're interested in. They're looking for speed and relevance in Web sites, which is a little bit different from the high-income pessimists, who want to feel comfortable and familiar.

Entrepreneur.com: How is the Internet changing the traditional business model and revenue streams?

Modahl: It really changes all the elements of the revenue stream. It typically makes it possible to offer a new product or value, perhaps even changing the definition of value in a product. If you look at the ways products are sold in traditional channels and the way they're sold on the Internet, you'll often find a new kind of value proposition on the Internet.

The Internet is also affecting pricing. It's making pricing much, much more competitive. And you see lower pricing levels overall as well as more variability in pricing on the Internet.

Then finally, it often changes your customer base. If you look at a product that's sold in the traditional marketplace, often that same product will find new customers online, people that maybe never bought it before. Take the example of eBay. This business has roots in want advertising—people listing their old swingset for sale. And now all of a sudden, eBay is serving a whole new group of people, who are essentially creating part-time jobs by listing stuff for sale on eBay and profiting from it. A whole new customer base has been created in this medium that really didn't exist in the parent business, if you will, which was the want advertiser.

Entrepreneur.com: How is business being affected by high ad revenues—some businesses may be making more money on the ads they sell than on the products they offer.

Modahl: I think you see a lot of cross-over of one revenue type for another in Internet businesses. A lot of that is due to the immaturity of the market, where people are really still trying to figure out what the revenue models are in a lot of industries.

Entrepreneur.com: Do you think that will change as business on the Internet matures?

Modahl: [It will] to some extent, although we're actually in a second generation of business model development. There was a first wave of radical business I talk about in the book. And right now as we're going forward, you're seeing second wave efforts to rejigger and attack the business models of dotcoms. I think we're still in period of turmoil on this. Eventually I would expect more stability.

Entrepreneur.com: In a chapter called "Company Value," you discuss building a brand. What are some unique challenges in this area for Internet companies?

Modahl: When it comes to building a brand, one of the most difficult aspects of that is that people will pick up and use your name and logo all over the Internet. People will write about you and talk about you, and you really don't have the kind of control people have been used to associating with branding. In fact, control really doesn't apply in this world. So while obviously you need to try and be consistent about your messages, it's actually much more important to be able to exchange in a dialogue—two-way conversation and things that no one party controls. And that can be very scary.

Entrepreneur.com: How are intangible assets changing business?

Modahl: Intangibles have certainly become very important in valuing companies. You can't really put a value on somebody's technology know-how or customer base, not the kind of hard value you put on factory assets. That's an important aspect of the new economy.

One thing I would say about intangible assets is that their value is variable. What is an incredibly valuable brand can be real third-rate goods the next day. And the volatility of value is a real challenge for management in the Internet economy. You can have great technology know-how and leadership, and that can be worth millions, even billions, of dollars, and you can lose that leadership in six months and find that's it worth a tiny fraction of what it was worth six months ago. That kind of volatility is something that everybody is really trying to get more accustomed to.


 

 http://www.ecommercealert.com/article2.html
 

FORRESTER TECHNOGRAPHICS FINDS ONLINE CONSUMER FEARFUL OF PRIVACY VIOLATIONS

November 1, 1999

      Two-thirds of online shoppers feel insecure about exchanging personal information over the Internet, affecting the amount of time and money consumers spend online. According to a new Technographics Report from Forrester Research, Inc., privacy fears hold back Web shopping. Only a small percentage of Web users with serious concerns shop online, while consumers with moderate concerns spend 21 percent less than their more at ease counterparts. As a result of these fears, Forrester recommends a privacy best-practice model to help companies gain customer trust and build brand loyalty.

      "Nearly 90 percent of online consumers want the right to control how their personal information is used after it is collected," said Christopher M. Kelley, associate analyst in Technogr aphics Data & Analysis. "This desire for online anonymity cuts across consumers from a broad range of demographic backgrounds, including gender, income, and age. Surprisingly, these concerns change very little as consumers spend more time online."

      Forrester found that online shoppers are most concerned about how much personal information they give and who sees it. Web users worry that the information they share online will produce unsolicited spam or telemarketing calls. As a result, 80 percent of Internet users support a policy that prohibits the sale of data to third parties, and half of online customers are willing to contact the government to regulate online privacy.

      Consumers prefer to give out personal information when they receive specific benefits for sharing it, including the chance to win free goods through sweepstakes and promotions. In addition, 30 percent of online shoppers will give out some data to their favorite retailers even w hen they are not buying. Though less important, access to members-only sections of a site get approximately one-fifth of Web users to share private information.

      Based on consumer concern for control over their personal data, as well as the benefits of dispensing private information, Forrester has created a four-tier privacy best practice model that helps companies develop richer customer relationships while delivering a more rewarding experience to Internet users. At Level 1, visitors choose anonymity, deliberately forgoing the additional benefits offered by personalization and premium content. Retailers build trust by promising not to collect data or use cookies. With the addition of convenient, targeted content or additional site access, consumers enter into Level 2, a one-way communication relationship whereby merchants promise not to initiate contact with the shopper or disseminate personal information to third parties.

      At Level 3, consumers agree to two-way communication with retailers. At this stage, visitors share more personally identifying data in exchange for proactive notifications of specials from the retailer. With 83 percent of online households wanting email from preferred retailers, companies are able to unlock the power of email marketing to drive site traffic and repeat purchases. Level 4 is considered a trusting relationship, whereby shoppers seek advice and active solicitations from their favorite merchants, including deals offered by established partners.

      "A coherent privacy model gives retailers the ability to monitor how their consumers feel about them. The first step is to advertise privacy policies boldly and in plain English," added Kelley. "With 11 million households shopping online for the first time in 2000, it will become critical for merchants to build customer trust and loyalty in order to remain competitive in a proliferating marketplace."

      Forrester surveyed nearly 100,000 American and Canadian members of NPD's consumer mail panel. For the Report "The Privacy Best Practice," Forrester recontacted 10,000 online households from the NPD study on privacy issues and eCommerce attitudes and behavior.

E-Commerce Alerts are issued by Bennett Gold, Chartered Accountants as situations develop. Bookmark this site and check
 
 
 
Subject: Interview Mary Modahl Wired

 

 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.05/modahl_pr.html
 
 
 

W I R E D
Archive | 4.05 - May 1996 | feature



Touchstone

If you want to know what's really new in new media, you ask Mary Modahl.

By Harvey Blume



    It's becoming almost standard in reports on new technology to find a quote from someone at Forrester Research Inc., a rapidly growing research firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That someone, more often than not, is Mary Modahl, Forrester's group director, the author of The Forrester Report on People and Technology, and a woman whose views on new media are highly sought on Wall Street.

    When I met Modahl, Forrester was about to expand once again. There was determined activity everywhere but nearly no unoccupied space. When we did settle down in a momentarily empty office, Modahl's conversational style regarding the future of the Internet turned out to be quirky, high-speed, and data rich.


    Wired: Will the Internet collapse under the weight of its own success?

    Modahl

    : So far as Wall Street goes, you're going to see a certain sobriety take over, an end to what has been called momentum investing. But will the Internet be brought down under its own weight? Not at all. The move to commercialization means there's a very significant build-out of the Internet by companies who want to offer a service. That will result in a considerable more reliable network.

    Will the Internet collapse under the weight of its own success?

    Right now it's like neutron bomb went off on the Web. All the buildings are there, but you don't have a sense of people the way you do in online services where there's an aliveness, a sense of others. The way-out vision for the Web is that when you go to a site, there will be people. You sense them, they sense you. It's a social experience, like walking into a store. Right now, it's like looking at signs and billboards.

    It could be like AOL's instant-message features, it could be avatars, it could be 3-D, 2-D, or even print, but when you get to a Web site, you want to know who's there. You want to be able to meet your friends.

    You wrote that Web commerce today amounts to "a dozen pizzas, two or three flower bouquets a week, and a dozen subscriptions," but by the year 2000, there will be US$7 billion in sales. How do you get from two pizzas to $7 billion?

    Pizza prices soar! No, the thing to keep in perspective is that $7 billion is diddly when we're talking retail sales. Retail sales in the US are more like $5 trillion. Catalog sales are $53 billion.

    You're going to see travel purchases increase. YOu're going to see a lot more software and hardware sold online. We're also optimistic about grocery-shopping services like Peapod. Grocery bills typically range from $100 to $200 a week. Less than 20 percent of the online population will do their shopping online, but those who do will spend a lot, from airline tickets to groceries.

    Will advertising play a major role on the Net?

    Advertisers are willing to spend on the medium. There will be 33 million people in the US on the Internet by the years 2000, and some projections are much higher. This is an upper-income demographic, more educated than average, more likely to have children. It's the demographic that most consumer-goods companies want to talk to most.

    How they do that needs to be examined. New models need to be explored. And that's where content smashes together with advertising. In the early days of television, there was a Geritol-sponsored game show. On the Web, we may see the Doritos content site.

    If the Net gets better for business, will that come at the expense of personal expression?

    The possibility of the Internet supporting a new art form is huge. I don't think the presence of business will interfere with that any more than the presence of Citicorp prevents the East Village from existing.

     

    Will dumb, internet-only terminals replace PCs?

    I think it's a dumb idea. Just producing a $500 computer that does anything useful has proven to be extremely difficult. And videograme-machine producers will tell you that even at $300 you enter a pricing abyss, where consumers just don't want to buy.

    Will expanding bandwidth make real-time phone service commercially viable over the Internet?

    No. Real-time voice is a hobby, like ham radio, not a permanent application. As a packet-switching network, the Internet just isn't matched to voice streams that need continuous connection to run well. Anyway, the phone system works - why fix it?

    When you write that "vices such as pornography, gambling, and money laundering" flourish on the Internet, does that mean you are calling for censorship?

    I don't think government censorship can succeed. They can pass laws, but enforcement will be very difficult. I think you will begin to see the equivalent of red-light districts, centers of the Internet understood to be pornographic, so that people can stay away or lock their children out if they want to. Search tools and indexing can provide a clear delineation between red-light and green-light sites, so you can stick to your side of the street.

    Should government subsidize telecommunications as a way to boost the economy?

    It's very important for government to look at the Internet as a national strategic asset with about a $100 billion impact on the economy. But in the Untied States, subsidy is unnecessary. The competitive activity in the industry is very high; the pressure on prices to come down is very strong. The scope of participation - new entrants as well as established players - is such that subsidy is not necessary here, though it may be in other countries.

    Speaking of other countries, why is there less furor about connectivity in Europe, less concern about getting wired?

    There is not a love affair with technology the way there is in the US. We're kind of like the Borg - bizarre people on Star Trek who are hal machine, half human. We are the Borg of the world community.

     


    -Harvey Blume (joel@ai.mit.edu) is a critic and co-author of Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo.

    Subject: Interview Mary Modahl Wired

     
     
     
     

    W I R E D
    Archive | 4.05 - May 1996 | feature



    Touchstone

    If you want to know what's really new in new media, you ask Mary Modahl.

    By Harvey Blume



      It's becoming almost standard in reports on new technology to find a quote from someone at Forrester Research Inc., a rapidly growing research firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That someone, more often than not, is Mary Modahl, Forrester's group director, the author of The Forrester Report on People and Technology, and a woman whose views on new media are highly sought on Wall Street.

      When I met Modahl, Forrester was about to expand once again. There was determined activity everywhere but nearly no unoccupied space. When we did settle down in a momentarily empty office, Modahl's conversational style regarding the future of the Internet turned out to be quirky, high-speed, and data rich.


      Wired: Will the Internet collapse under the weight of its own success?

      Modahl

      : So far as Wall Street goes, you're going to see a certain sobriety take over, an end to what has been called momentum investing. But will the Internet be brought down under its own weight? Not at all. The move to commercialization means there's a very significant build-out of the Internet by companies who want to offer a service. That will result in a considerable more reliable network.

      Will the Internet collapse under the weight of its own success?

      Right now it's like neutron bomb went off on the Web. All the buildings are there, but you don't have a sense of people the way you do in online services where there's an aliveness, a sense of others. The way-out vision for the Web is that when you go to a site, there will be people. You sense them, they sense you. It's a social experience, like walking into a store. Right now, it's like looking at signs and billboards.

      It could be like AOL's instant-message features, it could be avatars, it could be 3-D, 2-D, or even print, but when you get to a Web site, you want to know who's there. You want to be able to meet your friends.

      You wrote that Web commerce today amounts to "a dozen pizzas, two or three flower bouquets a week, and a dozen subscriptions," but by the year 2000, there will be US$7 billion in sales. How do you get from two pizzas to $7 billion?

      Pizza prices soar! No, the thing to keep in perspective is that $7 billion is diddly when we're talking retail sales. Retail sales in the US are more like $5 trillion. Catalog sales are $53 billion.

      You're going to see travel purchases increase. YOu're going to see a lot more software and hardware sold online. We're also optimistic about grocery-shopping services like Peapod. Grocery bills typically range from $100 to $200 a week. Less than 20 percent of the online population will do their shopping online, but those who do will spend a lot, from airline tickets to groceries.

      Will advertising play a major role on the Net?

      Advertisers are willing to spend on the medium. There will be 33 million people in the US on the Internet by the years 2000, and some projections are much higher. This is an upper-income demographic, more educated than average, more likely to have children. It's the demographic that most consumer-goods companies want to talk to most.

      How they do that needs to be examined. New models need to be explored. And that's where content smashes together with advertising. In the early days of television, there was a Geritol-sponsored game show. On the Web, we may see the Doritos content site.

      If the Net gets better for business, will that come at the expense of personal expression?

      The possibility of the Internet supporting a new art form is huge. I don't think the presence of business will interfere with that any more than the presence of Citicorp prevents the East Village from existing.

       

      Will dumb, internet-only terminals replace PCs?

      I think it's a dumb idea. Just producing a $500 computer that does anything useful has proven to be extremely difficult. And videograme-machine producers will tell you that even at $300 you enter a pricing abyss, where consumers just don't want to buy.

      Will expanding bandwidth make real-time phone service commercially viable over the Internet?

      No. Real-time voice is a hobby, like ham radio, not a permanent application. As a packet-switching network, the Internet just isn't matched to voice streams that need continuous connection to run well. Anyway, the phone system works - why fix it?

      When you write that "vices such as pornography, gambling, and money laundering" flourish on the Internet, does that mean you are calling for censorship?

      I don't think government censorship can succeed. They can pass laws, but enforcement will be very difficult. I think you will begin to see the equivalent of red-light districts, centers of the Internet understood to be pornographic, so that people can stay away or lock their children out if they want to. Search tools and indexing can provide a clear delineation between red-light and green-light sites, so you can stick to your side of the street.

      Should government subsidize telecommunications as a way to boost the economy?

      It's very important for government to look at the Internet as a national strategic asset with about a $100 billion impact on the economy. But in the Untied States, subsidy is unnecessary. The competitive activity in the industry is very high; the pressure on prices to come down is very strong. The scope of participation - new entrants as well as established players - is such that subsidy is not necessary here, though it may be in other countries.

      Speaking of other countries, why is there less furor about connectivity in Europe, less concern about getting wired?

      There is not a love affair with technology the way there is in the US. We're kind of like the Borg - bizarre people on Star Trek who are hal machine, half human. We are the Borg of the world community.

       


      -Harvey Blume (joel@ai.mit.edu) is a critic and co-author of Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo.

       



    Guest Services: MI Home
    Who We Are
    e-Commerce
        Value Grid
    e-Portal
    e-Stats
    e-Links
    e-Valuator Tool

     

    Client Services: e-Sessions
    e-Seminars
    e-Strategies
    e-Stats

    U.S. Online Retail Projections by Category

    Download projections in PowerPoint format from Forrester's Web site

    From Mary Modahl's excellent book "Now Or Never" 2000.
    View a listing of all the figures from the book that are available online.
    Go to the book's home page.

     


     
    Data Nuggets from BusinessWeek

    A regularly updated collection of facts and figures on eBusiness

    From BusinessWeek e.biz Online

     


     
    Jupiter Communications December 1999 Survey Shows the Struggles of Today's Online Retailers

    TABLE: Tough Road Ahead for Online Retailers

    From Business Week article 05/15/00

     


     
    The Growth of B2B Exchanges

    CHART: As Corporate Buying Moves Online ... E-Marketplaces Should Take Off

    From Business Week article 03/13/00

     


     
    Harris Interactive Survey on "Holiday E-Commerce Winners and Losers" Read the Press Release

    From biz.yahoo 01/12/00

     


     
    Categories of Online Shoppers

    TABLE: Shopping the Web

    From Business Week article 12/20/99

     


     
    Demographics of the Web

    CHART: Wired America: White, Urban, and College-Educated

    From A Small Town Reveals America's Digital Divide (Business Week article 10/04/99)

     


     
    Business-to-Consumer Online Sales

    1998 $7.8 billion
    2003 $108 billion

    Source: Forrester Research Inc. from 'Twas the season for e-splurging (Business Week article 01/11/99)

     


     
    Business-to-Business E-Commerce

    1998 $43 billion
    2003 $1.3 trillion

    Source: Forrester Research Inc. from Electronic Commerce - A Survival Guide (Business Week e.biz Report on Electronic Commerce 03/22/99)

     


     
    Number of People Online Worldwide

    1999 159 million
    2003 510 million

    Source: International Data fromElectronic Commerce - A Survival Guide (Business Week e.biz Report on Electronic Commerce 03/22/99)

     


     
    Number of Web Pages

    Jan 1998 320 million
    July 1999 800 million

    Web Pages Cateloged by Leading Search Engine

    Jan 1998 33 %
    July 1999 16 %

    Web Pages Cateloged by Leading Search Engines Combined

    Jan 1998 60 %
    July 1999 42 %

    Source: Lawrence and Giles, "Accessibility of Information on the Web", Nature, July 8, 1999.

     


     
    Percentage of CEOs who Regularly Log onto the Internet

    1999 25%

    Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers fromElectronic Commerce - A Survival Guide (Business Week e.biz Report on Electronic Commerce 03/22/99)

     


     
    Percent of Visa Transactions via the Web

    1998 1% of sales thru the Web
    2003 10% of sales thru the Web

    Source: 'Twas the season for e-splurging (Business Week article 01/11/99)

     


     
    Average Cost for a Financial Institution
    to Respond to a Customer Query

    Using a Web Page Query = $0.04
    Via a Live Telephone Call = $1.44

    Source: Forrester Research Inc. from Electronic Commerce - A Survival Guide (Business Week e.biz Report on Electronic Commerce 03/22/99)

     


     
    Estimated Book Sales Online

    By 2004, 20% to 30% of all book sales will be online

    Source: Boston Consulting Group Inc. from 'Twas the season for e-splurging (Business Week article 01/11/99)

     


     
    Online Sales by Income

    Sales to people with annual incomes greater than $50,000:

    47% of total retail sales
    74% of online sales

    Source: 'Twas the season for e-splurging (Business Week article 01/11/99)

     


     


    Copyright © 1999-2000 Management Intelligence. All Rights Reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express
    written permission of Management Intelligence is prohibited.


 

 

 

 

 

COVER STORY -- E.BIZ -- THE E.BIZ 25

Mary Modahl
Modahl predicts that a raft of cash-poor e-tailers will flame out by yearend, victims of a get-rich ''cancer''

Mary Modahl

Forrester Research
----------
Position: Vice-president, marketing

Contribution: In 1997, she was one of the first analysts to predict that business-to-business trading would be a big deal on the Web. And she championed dynamic trading--involving a host of buyers and sellers--rather than one-to-one haggling.

Challenge: To predict the future for an increasingly fragmented technology market. As a newly promoted Forrester exec, she has to keep the company competitive with larger rival Gartner Group and boutique outfits Jupiter, Yankee, and Giga.

Old-line retailers were supposed to have been Amazoned by nimble, guerrilla e-tailers. But Mary Modahl says traditional companies may turn out to be the 800-pound gorillas in this jungle. Forrester Research's (FORR) recently named marketing chief predicts an imminent--and bloody--revenge of the brick-and-mortar sellers. ''The virtual company turned out to be a big lie,'' she says.

Net hypesters, beware. Modahl, based in Cambridge, Mass., has become a trusted consigliera for e-businesses by bringing a piercing eye to the era of the New Net Thing. While many Net consultants specialize in one narrow industry, Modahl's clients include everyone from the Web site Travelocity to Johnson & Johnson.

Modahl's opinions have inspired momentous decisions. She helped nudge America Online away from hourly pricing to flat monthly charges. She persuaded the Weather Channel to begin distributing its info via links on thousands of other sites. Its Web site now counts among the top 25. And she was instrumental in helping Federal Express offer online package-tracking --in the Net's commercial Dark Ages of 1994, no less. ''She's spot-on at identifying trends, and she can articulate them in a way people understand,'' says Dennis H. Jones, FedEx chief information officer.

Her latest insights could change the way people size up Net consumers. Marketers traditionally pigeonhole consumers by their age, income, or occupation. Modahl thinks that when it comes to e-commerce, it's much more important to consider their attitudes toward technology. She separates the U.S. population into tech optimists and pessimists. That concept forms the basis for her new book, Now or Never, which lays out her vision that the e-business battle is still in its infancy and that ''traditional companies are only now beginning to fight back.'' She argues that 48% of Americans are still tech pessimists, who will rely on established brands and their sophisticated distribution and customer support. What's more, a raft of cash-poor e-tailers will flame out by yearend, victims of a get-rich ''cancer'' that has little to do with building lasting enterprises.

Skepticism and a fascination with research run in Modahl's blood (her mother is a UC-Irvine neurobiologist). After graduating from Harvard, she worked for three years as a loan officer scrutinizing credit applications. But she chafed under the structure. ''I was never going to fit. I was too outspoken,'' says Modahl. She still has a sharp tongue. Woe is the company that receives one of Modahl's signature putdowns: ''That's so-o-o last Thursday.''

Even back in the 1980s, Modahl could see the future. In college, she read Esther Dyson's influential tech newsletter, Release 1.0, and wrote her thesis on competition in the semiconductor industry. She found Forrester's name in a trade magazine and gave a blind call. Hired in 1988, she began analyzing corporate networking, which led to her uncovering the promise of the Net.

Unlike many of the newbie Net analysts, Modahl's wealth of industry-watching experience has given her a more balanced, long-term view. Indeed, analysts' reputations are most often made on their ability to predict correctly, and Modahl has proved uncommonly prescient. For instance, a 1997 Modahl report defined the huge opportunity for online business-to-business trading hubs. Of course, not every shot is a bull's-eye. Her prediction that the Internet would kill AOL's proprietary service was dead wrong. ''I'm still amazed to this day that they survived,'' she says.

Modahl's rise to prominence has mirrored Forrester's own emergence from a five-person, boutique operation in 1988 into a 500-employee firm with an $800 million market cap. In her new role as head of marketing, she is pushing Forrester into providing business-to-business market research. There she will find increasing competition from the likes of Gartner Group and smaller outfits like the Yankee Group and Giga Information Group. But Modahl isn't blinking. For now, she's at the top of the advice game, and it's no stretch to predict she'll stay there.

e.biz online
For a Q & A with Mary Modahl, visit ebiz.businessweek.com.

By Dennis K. Berman




WHAT ADVERTISING WORKS?

by Bill Doyle, Mary A. Modahl, Ben Abbott, Forrester Research

Advertisers are rolling up their sleeves to figure out how to make advertising work on the Web. They are torn about what to spend and who to hire. But as Web advertising becomes a significant portion of marketing budgets, advertisers will need to adopt a set of best practices for this new medium.

Advertisers are searching for the formula that will unlock the potential of the Web. Forrester interviewed 51 companies that currently advertise on the Web and found that:

  • Spending patterns vary. Consumer brands spend a small fraction of their budgets on the Web.
  • Technology companies spend five times more of their brand dollars there. Spending on sites
  • still exceeds spending on ads.
  • Banner campaigns run the gamut. There is no such thing as a typical Web advertising campaign.
  • Ad pricing frustrates advertisers.Nearly three-quarters of the respondents want pricing to be based on results rather that CPM.
  • Personalized targeting has not yet taken hold. Advertisers target mainly on content.
  • Web advertising needs best practices. As Web advertising becomes a significant portion of marketing budgets over the next four years, advertisers need to develop a set of best practices around what to build and what to pay.

WHAT TO BUILD
Advertisers on the Web have three choices. They can build: 1) destination sites, which use information, entertainment, and high production values to pull users in and bring them back again; 2) micro-sites, small clusters of brand pages hosted by content sites or networks; or 3) banner campaigns and other low-overhead Web advertising-like sponsorships (see Figure 1). To understand which is best, advertisers need to ask:

  • Can it be sold online? Products that can be sold online and shipped economically or delivered digitally-such as music, tickets, books, software, and mutual funds-can use a destination site to support everything from brand awareness and consideration, through post-sales support. But if the Net doesn't enable your company to offer a product faster, cheaper, or better, rule out a destination site.
  • Is it a considered purchase? Sellers of complex products like computers, cars, and industrial coatings can use a Web site to squeeze costs, allowing prospects to check specifications, configure their purchase, and get product support on-line (see Figure 2). But if your customers are more likely to ask their neighbors than you about your product, you don't need a Web site.


Destination Sites Create A New Channel
Destination sites are right only for companies that can use the Net as a full-fledged channel for exchanging information with customers, in order to book a sale (See the September/October, 1996 Leadership Strategies Report, "The Fourth Channel: Vision.") Advertisers that do build destination sites should:

  • Do a gut check beforehand. A company must be willing to spend $3 million or more to build a destination site and then more to maintain it. A half-baked site actually will erode a brand. Don't underestimate the volume of customer interactions. L.L. Bean dedicates a team of customer service reps to reply to e-mail seven days a week.
  • License, don't produce content. True content providers always will outpublish advertisers. When Toyota first moved onto the Web, it created seven different lifestyle 'zines. Today only Car Culture remains-and that will soon be produced by one of the big auto publishers.
  • Get found. Once a site exists, marketers need to promote it. Smart companies dedicate at least 20% of their overall interactive budgets to promoting the site online. They also sneak URLs into print and TV ads and become experts in such Web guerrilla marketing techniques as getting found by search engines and trading links with other sites.

Micro-Sites Are Sufficient For Considered-Purchase Products
Micro-sites enable advertisers to communicate deeper product benefits and collect customer information without the cost of a full-blown Web site. Advertisers of considered purchases like clothes and appliances should:

  • Put micro-sites where the audience is. The rumored $3 million that Levi's spent on its early way-hip site could have put micro-sites on all the top youth sites for months. Appliance manufacturers like Whirlpool should embed product selectors in such sites as remodeling.hw.net.
  • Maintain clues that this is advertising. Commercial content masquerading as editorial undermines the trust on which brands are built.

Banners Are Enough for Most Off-the-shelf Products
Most consumer goods companies should use their resources to:

  • Build interactive banners. Banners should let viewers request free samples, register to win, and order products. Recent examples: HP lets people play "Pong;" First Virtual sells Casio watches; and Metlife provides your ideal weight.

  • Sponsor appropriate content. Instead of building a big site, a brand like P&G's Tide should be looking for a way to sponsor the online schedules of every Little League in the country. A logo and positioning line are sufficient to make an impression.
  • Maintain a corporate site. Companies need a "face to the public" that catches search engine queries and serves investor relations and recruiting groups. But consumer brands should resist pumping up the site with product information. Save that money for creative campaigns.

WHAT TO PAY
Ad space and agency pricing mechanisms are still in flux. Smart advertisers will:

  • Lock in low rates. Early advertisers can win favorable treatment from grateful sites and networks. Lock up search engine keywords with a right of first refusal. Negotiate a first-sponsor rate in perpetuity.
  • Come to terms with CPM. Results-based pricing will appear on the Web - but we don't think that it will dominate. Why? Sold-out sites like CNET don't need to take the risk. Instead advertisers should hold their agencies accountable for click-through results.
  • Reset expectations. In traditional media, an advertiser might spend just 20% of its budget with an agency on ad development, placement, and account management -with much of that covered by commissions. The other 80% goes to the media properties. On the web, this ratio is closer to 50:50 for now. So don't expect your agency to survive by commissions - plan to pay fees.


But most of all, plan to use the medium. Most everyone else will be doing likewise.
This report is digested from the March 1997 Forrester Report, "What Advertising Works." In addition to interviews with 51 Web advertisers, Forrester spoke with 35 industry participants from agencies, software companies, and ad networks. These included: Ad Age, AGENCY.COM, Anderson & Lembke, Berkeley Systems, Commonwealth, DoubleClick, FlyCast, Focalink, Foote, Cone & Belding, Grey Interactive, I/PRO, Kirshenbaum Bond & Partners, The Laredo Group, LinkExchange, Modem Media, Narrowline, NetCount, NetGravity, Organic Online, Poppe Tyson, Red Sky Interactive, Riddler.com, Saatchi & Saatchi, SiteSpecific, Strategic Interactive Group, Submit It!, Sunrise Media, TBWA Chiat/Day, The Web Magazine, WebRep, Western International Media, and Ziff-Davis Publishing.

 




WHAT ADVERTISING WORKS?

by Bill Doyle, Mary A. Modahl, Ben Abbott, Forrester Research

Advertisers are rolling up their sleeves to figure out how to make advertising work on the Web. They are torn about what to spend and who to hire. But as Web advertising becomes a significant portion of marketing budgets, advertisers will need to adopt a set of best practices for this new medium.

Advertisers are searching for the formula that will unlock the potential of the Web. Forrester interviewed 51 companies that currently advertise on the Web and found that:

  • Spending patterns vary. Consumer brands spend a small fraction of their budgets on the Web.
  • Technology companies spend five times more of their brand dollars there. Spending on sites
  • still exceeds spending on ads.
  • Banner campaigns run the gamut. There is no such thing as a typical Web advertising campaign.
  • Ad pricing frustrates advertisers.Nearly three-quarters of the respondents want pricing to be based on results rather that CPM.
  • Personalized targeting has not yet taken hold. Advertisers target mainly on content.
  • Web advertising needs best practices. As Web advertising becomes a significant portion of marketing budgets over the next four years, advertisers need to develop a set of best practices around what to build and what to pay.

WHAT TO BUILD
Advertisers on the Web have three choices. They can build: 1) destination sites, which use information, entertainment, and high production values to pull users in and bring them back again; 2) micro-sites, small clusters of brand pages hosted by content sites or networks; or 3) banner campaigns and other low-overhead Web advertising-like sponsorships (see Figure 1). To understand which is best, advertisers need to ask:

  • Can it be sold online? Products that can be sold online and shipped economically or delivered digitally-such as music, tickets, books, software, and mutual funds-can use a destination site to support everything from brand awareness and consideration, through post-sales support. But if the Net doesn't enable your company to offer a product faster, cheaper, or better, rule out a destination site.
  • Is it a considered purchase? Sellers of complex products like computers, cars, and industrial coatings can use a Web site to squeeze costs, allowing prospects to check specifications, configure their purchase, and get product support on-line (see Figure 2). But if your customers are more likely to ask their neighbors than you about your product, you don't need a Web site.


Destination Sites Create A New Channel
Destination sites are right only for companies that can use the Net as a full-fledged channel for exchanging information with customers, in order to book a sale (See the September/October, 1996 Leadership Strategies Report, "The Fourth Channel: Vision.") Advertisers that do build destination sites should:

  • Do a gut check beforehand. A company must be willing to spend $3 million or more to build a destination site and then more to maintain it. A half-baked site actually will erode a brand. Don't underestimate the volume of customer interactions. L.L. Bean dedicates a team of customer service reps to reply to e-mail seven days a week.
  • License, don't produce content. True content providers always will outpublish advertisers. When Toyota first moved onto the Web, it created seven different lifestyle 'zines. Today only Car Culture remains-and that will soon be produced by one of the big auto publishers.
  • Get found. Once a site exists, marketers need to promote it. Smart companies dedicate at least 20% of their overall interactive budgets to promoting the site online. They also sneak URLs into print and TV ads and become experts in such Web guerrilla marketing techniques as getting found by search engines and trading links with other sites.

Micro-Sites Are Sufficient For Considered-Purchase Products
Micro-sites enable advertisers to communicate deeper product benefits and collect customer information without the cost of a full-blown Web site. Advertisers of considered purchases like clothes and appliances should:

  • Put micro-sites where the audience is. The rumored $3 million that Levi's spent on its early way-hip site could have put micro-sites on all the top youth sites for months. Appliance manufacturers like Whirlpool should embed product selectors in such sites as remodeling.hw.net.
  • Maintain clues that this is advertising. Commercial content masquerading as editorial undermines the trust on which brands are built.

Banners Are Enough for Most Off-the-shelf Products
Most consumer goods companies should use their resources to:

  • Build interactive banners. Banners should let viewers request free samples, register to win, and order products. Recent examples: HP lets people play "Pong;" First Virtual sells Casio watches; and Metlife provides your ideal weight.

  • Sponsor appropriate content. Instead of building a big site, a brand like P&G's Tide should be looking for a way to sponsor the online schedules of every Little League in the country. A logo and positioning line are sufficient to make an impression.
  • Maintain a corporate site. Companies need a "face to the public" that catches search engine queries and serves investor relations and recruiting groups. But consumer brands should resist pumping up the site with product information. Save that money for creative campaigns.

WHAT TO PAY
Ad space and agency pricing mechanisms are still in flux. Smart advertisers will:

  • Lock in low rates. Early advertisers can win favorable treatment from grateful sites and networks. Lock up search engine keywords with a right of first refusal. Negotiate a first-sponsor rate in perpetuity.
  • Come to terms with CPM. Results-based pricing will appear on the Web - but we don't think that it will dominate. Why? Sold-out sites like CNET don't need to take the risk. Instead advertisers should hold their agencies accountable for click-through results.
  • Reset expectations. In traditional media, an advertiser might spend just 20% of its budget with an agency on ad development, placement, and account management -with much of that covered by commissions. The other 80% goes to the media properties. On the web, this ratio is closer to 50:50 for now. So don't expect your agency to survive by commissions - plan to pay fees.


But most of all, plan to use the medium. Most everyone else will be doing likewise.
This report is digested from the March 1997 Forrester Report, "What Advertising Works." In addition to interviews with 51 Web advertisers, Forrester spoke with 35 industry participants from agencies, software companies, and ad networks. These included: Ad Age, AGENCY.COM, Anderson & Lembke, Berkeley Systems, Commonwealth, DoubleClick, FlyCast, Focalink, Foote, Cone & Belding, Grey Interactive, I/PRO, Kirshenbaum Bond & Partners, The Laredo Group, LinkExchange, Modem Media, Narrowline, NetCount, NetGravity, Organic Online, Poppe Tyson, Red Sky Interactive, Riddler.com, Saatchi & Saatchi, SiteSpecific, Strategic Interactive Group, Submit It!, Sunrise Media, TBWA Chiat/Day, The Web Magazine, WebRep, Western International Media, and Ziff-Davis Publishing.

 



"Being a Dot-Com In and Of Itself Is Not a Strategic Advantage"

In a Q&A, Mary Modahl of Forrester Research talks about the evolution and future of e-commerce

MARY MODAHL
Mary Modahl, research VP at Forrester Research




It was the sort of flub that could ruin a market researcher's career. In 1995, Mary Modahl, vice-president for research with technology trend watcher Forrester Research Inc., predicted that America Online would hit the skids. Consumer enthusiasm for Internet-based services, she said, would soon supplant private networks like AOL's.

Of course, the world's leading online service has since proved her spectacularly wrong. Fortunately for Modahl, that was the only major forecasting slip she has made since joining Forrester in 1988. And she has made some other bets that paid off big. Almost three years ago, for instance, she said online business-to-business trade would quickly blast past consumer e-commerce, reaching $327 billion by 2002. That was a shockingly high estimate then, but not anymore: B2B e-commerce is now one of the business world's hottest trends.

Modahl's willingness to go out on a limb is why she's one of the premier thinkers on e-business today. "Companies listen to her more than they listen to other people," says former Forrester colleague Bill Bass, now vice-president for e-commerce at Lands' End. Now, so can the rest of the world. Modahl has written a book, Now or Never: How Companies Must Change Today to Win the Battle for Internet Consumers, that goes beyond predictions to outright prescriptions. In it, she says traditional companies still have a chance to make their mark online. But she insists they must make sweeping changes in their organizations, their branding, and their market focus to succeed.

"ONE OF THE GUSTS." It's a pointed message, but one that's no surprise to anyone who has followed Modahl's career. After graduating from Harvard University in 1983 with an economics degree -- earning money by modeling clothes for catalogs and store advertisements -- she went into banking at Bank of Boston. After three and a half years in Boston and London, however, she realized her penchant for questioning the status quo wouldn't move her up the career ladder from loan officer to management. "I was just never going to fit," she says. "I was never going to have the wingtip shoes."

Returning to the States with new husband Richard, Modahl decided to try getting into market research. The field had intrigued her ever since she came across pioneer technology analyst Esther Dyson while writing a college thesis on semiconductor-industry competition. Eventually, she persuaded Forrester founder and CEO George Colony to hire her in 1988 -- one appeal of Forrester being the permission to wear jeans -- and started covering computer networking.

Never a technology guru, Modahl moved Forrester toward analyzing technology's impact on consumers -- an angle for which Forrester is best-known today. Modahl's focus on divining customer attitudes has resulted in some unusually prescient advice. Bass recalls that several years ago, Modahl advised Time Warner to buy AOL or Yahoo! Inc., or one of those companies would buy Time Warner -- as AOL recently announced it would do. "She's one of the gusts of fresh air here," says William Bluestein, Forrester's vice-president for corporate strategy and development.

In 1994, she formed Forrester's new-media group, quickly moving to cover the exploding Internet and e-commerce fields. After trying out online chat herself, she was struck by the Net's power to connect people. "It was pretty clear that this was going to affect the media industry, financial services, retail, and business-to-business trade," she says. "When humans get together, a marketplace forms."

Although Modahl is quoted often, she jealously guards her privacy off the job. Living in Concord, Mass., with her husband and two young children, she says she has little time for anything but working and raising her family. Colleagues say she won't have a meeting early in the morning because she insists on taking her children to school every day she's not traveling. "I'm the proverbial soccer mom on the weekends," she says. Except for some hiking and skiing, "We pretty much just hang out with friends." Notes Bass: "Here's a person who forecasts massive change all the time, and she needs that stability."

Modahl recently talked with Rob Hof of Business Week's Silicon Valley bureau about the future of e-commerce. The key for companies laboring to incorporate the Net into their businesses, she says, is to understand how to reach very different kinds of consumers online -- and do it much more quickly than they'd ever dreamed before. Edited excerpts follow:

Q: Forrester segments the online consumer population into groups that are actually quite different from each other in terms of how they view technology. Can you describe these groups?
A:
The mainstream consumer base has this essential divide between high-income technology pessimists and low-income technology optimists. If you look at the distribution of disposable income, low-income optimists control under a trillion dollars in a total of over $6 trillion in personal disposable income. So they're a very small part of this available market.

But that really gives the lie to the fact of how important these guys are. If you look at them, they tend to be very educated, single [people] who, over time, will get married, most likely to each other, and turn into high-income optimists. If you look at the 16- to 22-year-old portion of that group, mostly college students, 62% of them are shopping online. That's incredible -- six times the rate of the overall population.

High-income pessimists are people who have the means to spend a lot online but whose natural predilections cause them to resist technology. When they do get online and get comfortable doing something, they tend to be far more loyal than other types of consumers. They're tough to win, but they're a great customer base to have once you get them. They don't surf around.

Right now, a lot of the business being done on the Internet is with people who will tolerate an amazing amount of difficulty. I mean, think about how long you have to wait after you turn your PC on. It drives me crazy. It's faster for me to buy from Gap or J. Crew with my catalog because it's on my coffee table, and I can dial my phone a lot faster than I can boot my PC. But I wade through all that, because I think technology is cool.

Q: How do companies market to these groups that have totally different needs and desires?
A:
The low-income optimists are interested in what's new, what's cool -- very communicative, they download music. They're not afraid of technology. And the kinds of messages that work with them center on lifestyle needs: Is it fun, is it cool, does it connect me with other people that I care about? Traditional consumers want to know: This isn't going to be scary, [that] it's familiar -- it's such a different approach. It's important to recognize how different their needs are.

Q: So what does a company like, say, Charles Schwab do online?
A:
If you look at a company like Schwab, they've done very well with high-income technology optimists -- the earliest early adopters. You had to be a brave client to be a Schwab client five years ago. Now, Schwab is really trying to broaden its market away from these very self-directed investors toward a group it calls the validators. These are people who fundamentally feel like they know what they're doing in their investment strategy, but still want to validate that with expert opinion. They will definitely pick up some high-income pessimists as well. Certainly more than, say, an AmeriTrade or an E*Trade.

Fidelity has done a really good job with high-income pessimists. They've really been strong in making more traditional consumers feel comfortable that they can go online and do business. And there's tremendous integration between the Web site and the telephone.

Q: Who does this imply will win online?
A:
I think it's an enormous benefit for traditional companies, if they can deliver an effective offering. A lot of them to date haven't been able to do that. But that said, the technology pessimist is not in a hurry with respect to the Internet. The existence of a brand and the trust really does make a difference in how they approach doing business. It's a lot easier for them.

Q: What traditional companies are doing things right? Should they do online operations internally or spin it out to be more independent?
A:
I don't think there's going to be a single answer. It depends on the particular leadership and governance of the company. In a company where most of the business is going to head to the Internet, and where the CEO really embraces that and is able to lead that kind of a transformation, undoubtedly the best strategy is to build from within the company. But this takes tremendous courage. Companies that transform to Internet companies are very badly punished in the stock market in the near term -- though that may be changing.

Where the CEO does not embrace it as completely and is unwilling or unable to lead the transformation, then some kind of separation is pretty important. There are even some businesses where I would argue a very substantial part of the business is not going to be online.

Q: Like maybe Wal-Mart Stores?
A:
Well, Forrester is suggesting that by 2003, something on the order of 7% of retail will be online. If you say Wal-Mart is the most mainstream example, you might imagine that something like 10% of their revenues ultimately would be online. So what does that mean for the structure of their Internet organization? I would suggest that it's pretty important from the consumer's point of view to have a consistent experience across the Internet and at retail. So the separation really jeopardizes that. But if you're unable to get the Web effort moving, then separation really becomes the only way.

Traditional companies suffer. They have a lot of infighting, who's in charge of the Web, customers object, shareholders object. They face challenges that dot-coms don't face.

Q: You write in your book about how difficult it is for traditional companies to deal with the rate of change on the Net, but it also seems to be so fast that even dot-coms have trouble keeping pace.
A:
It's a little bit like business model du jour. You're seeing it acutely in automobiles. First it was the Autobytel model -- passing leads onto dealers. All of a sudden, dealers found themselves with an avalanche of e-mail leads, less than a fifth of which they could actually follow up on. They just weren't set up to deal with these -- an e-mail lead was very iffy. That model seems to have generated some discontent on the part of dealers.

So now we're in the midst of a real shift to a model where the online site actually completes the sale of the car...so the dealer is essentially acting as an inventory provider. [But] most of the money is made in the financing of the car. So who gets to do the financing becomes the big tussle now.

This has all happened inside of two and a half years. It's a pretty fast pace for an industry that's used to thinking about model years two and three years out, where the biggest issues have always been the price of gas, the overall economy, and the price of imports. Now, all of a sudden, there's competition on their home turf for distribution and delivery. It illustrates how up in the air everything is.

Q: A lot of traditional companies like to tout how they can do "bricks and clicks" and therefore serve customers better than dot-coms? Does this mean dot-coms have to open physical stores?
A:
The virtual company turns out to be a big lie. But I think there will be both types. Take the catalog market. There are certainly catalogers that only sell through the mail. But in recent years, companies that have done better have been hybrids like J. Crew or Banana Republic or Victoria's Secret. But with L.L. Bean or Lands' End, most consumers don't get to see those labels on Main Street or in the mall. All the recent big hits have been crossover direct and retail brands, because the two channels feed each other. The mail-only companies can get out of touch, like J. Peterman.

Q: What does that say about Amazon.com and the other pure-play dot-coms?
A:
I would not suggest that Amazon should now go on a massive retail store-opening exercise. I do think there's room for clicks-only retailers. Amazon in some sense has a unique position. It's early, it has a huge brand, it works better than almost any store on the Internet.

Where traditional companies have a strength that Amazon doesn't have is that they can leverage their bricks. The best way to compete with Amazon is to do what they aren't doing: getting it locally at the store or having it delivered in the next hour.

I really think we are at a turning point in the marketplace. The dot-coms have absolutely had the upper hand throughout 1999. But clearly, being a dot-com in and of itself is not a strategic advantage. There's an advantage in being agile, in being new, in being funded, and in having a single purpose to your organization.

But the idea that traditional companies would just be DOA for the Internet has been off-base, and now you're starting to see traditional companies invest very significant amounts of money. A lot of it is traditional companies creating operating units that are becoming more and more effective. Toys 'R' Us has had difficulties, Wal-Mart has had troubles.

But we're still looking at very early days. It's not too late for companies who were badly chastised this year to come back in Christmas 2000 and 2001 and 2002 and really take a strong position. It is absolutely not over. The relative strength of traditional companies is going to become apparent over the next 12 to 18 months. I also think some dot-coms are going to fail to become profitable.

Many of them are not only selling at a loss on a total-cost basis, they're selling at a loss on a variable-cost basis. When you're buying product for $15 and selling it for $10, you can gain market share very quickly, but it's not a very sustainable model because you're attracting bottom-feeder price shoppers.

I'm expecting that there will be some long faces as some of the dot-coms realize they don't have their fulfillment act together. By the end of 2000, you'll start to see very significant dot-com flameouts. They've run through the $50 million or $60 million or $70 million in their IPO, but they still managed to run out of cash by the end of 2000, or mid-2001.

Q: Will it take that long to happen?
A:
It's pretty hard to burn through that much cash, even if you're burning it at a rate of $5 million a month. You've still got a 12- to 16-month window to get through that money.

Q: Amazon is often seen as the strongest e-tailer, but can it weather the coming changes?
A:
Their basic bet is that the relative scale at which you can become profitable is very, very large. Amazon has made tremendous investments in both of those, and the actual customer experience on their site is tremendously good compared with the Web average. The presence that they've created for the Amazon name has made a big impact. People who know nothing about e-commerce know about Amazon.

They are essentially hoping to follow in the footsteps of AOL and Yahoo!, and both those companies grew very quickly on the revenue side, generating very substantial losses. Amazon's theory is that they can scale up first and be profitable later. I'm certainly shocked by the scope of the losses, and most people are. I feel that their customer experience is so good that they have a solid customer base, but whether they're going to be able to turn this into a profitable operation is really anyone's guess. I'm not even sure how confident they actually are. Warehouse operations, customer service -- these are not switch-on-and-off kinds of things. Amazon is doing this on a scale that very much exceeds the scale at which AOL did it.

Q: One big difference is that Amazon is actually taking possession of goods -- that's very expensive.
A:
That's a good strategy, though. One of the biggest problems of dot-coms is that they have no control over fulfillment. We see a lot of these companies, 50 or 60 a week coming through Forrester, and you ask them how they're fulfilling products, and the answer is, "Oh, we outsource." There's zero control.

Q: How has the Internet changed the behavior of consumers overall?
A:
The biggest change is the fruit-fly phenomenon. The attention span is just getting so short now. It's not just "Show me," it's "Show me in less than three seconds." That has created new kinds of pressures. It's partly driven by the retail experience online, but a lot of it has been driven by the media experience online. In a single page will be multiple thought streams.

You go on a TV show now, and there will be a person interviewing another person, and below that ... two stock tickers going at two different rates. There's another thing above that giving sports scores. On the left hand at the top, there's breaking news. Five, six, seven unrelated items on a page is now becoming standard for media consumption. I'm sure that it's affecting brains. There's gotta be cool brain research going on about this.

So the media experience is changing how people view the shopping experience. The idea of careful looking, touching, spending time may be giving way to a desire to move quickly. You definitely see a clear relationship between the speed with which pages load and the amount people will spend per page. The premium on incredibly fast site performance and very few clicks to buy something is extremely important. If it's going to take more than three clicks, you're just history.

Q: It seems like that impatience is extending more and more to physical stores, too.
A:
There's no patience for uninformed shop assistants [in physical stores]. The in-store experience in most stores is terrible -- wandering up and down the aisles, it's a nightmare with children. So I think consumers will begin to divide up shopping for things they know they want to buy -- where they will really hit the Web fast. Anything you know you want to buy is faster to get on the Web.

If I know that I need some new mascara or eyeliner, I have to ask myself how long would it actually take me to get into a department store and buy these things. For me, it can take two weeks to actually find the time in my schedule. Even with a two-day delivery online, that's so much faster.

But that is so distinct from shopping for pleasure, which is a valid experience and will continue to exist. It can be fun to window-shop. You'll see consumers be multichannel shoppers, and I think the best retailers will be multichannel retailers, eventually. Your relationship with a store is not channel-specific, unless the retailer forces it to be that way.

Q: There's a lot of new buying models emerging, from Priceline's name-your-price to group buying like Mercata. How do you view their prospects?
A:
My nanny's family needed to come out and visit, and I would not have pegged them as technology-savvy people, but they went on Priceline and got their tickets. It was great for them. They saved hundreds of dollars. For low-income technology optimists, it's a tremendously beneficial service.

What I think is interesting about consumer behavior online is the demise of set pricing. Dynamic pricing is a huge deal on the Internet. Fixed pricing is a uniquely Western phenomenon. It's not widely practiced in South America or Asia. It is actually a very recent Western construct -- within 100 to 200 years old. Fixed pricing may actually be an aberration due to our monetary system. With the Internet, it actually may fade away again. I don't know if that's entirely the case, but the supply features of most consumer products are such that allowing pricing to clear the market is a better solution than allowing physical-distribution backups. Consumers do have a certain amount of enthusiasm for [dynamic pricing]. It's a form of entertainment.

You're going to see far more dynamic pricing. Even when the consumer perceives a fixed price, I think you're actually going to experience dynamic pricing. Amazon actually resets pricing on its products automatically. If the demand for a product goes up, they will reset that, based on a calculus that they do. The discount is reduced if the item soars in popularity.

Even if consumers don't always automatically go to buy the lowest price, the sheer fact that the competitors can see the pricing creates an efficiency in the market. I think that will cause a narrow range of pricing over time.

Q: What will be the role of shopping bots? They seem to change the playing field so fast that it's tough for e-tailers to deal with them.
A:
We're moving to a point where consumers can really see everything that's in the market. Consumers are different, too. Some feel comfortable with bots and others don't. Some consumers are price shoppers, and some aren't, and that is not income-related. And people are price-sensitive for some products and not for others. You can go into the parking lot of Sam's Club and Costco, and it's full of Mercedes and BMWs.

Q: Are more people who go online actually buying there, or is the percentage who shop online remaining steady?
A:
There used to be a window between the time when somebody would go online and when they would shop online. That window used to be 18 to 24 months. Every time we collect data, the window is closing. Now, somebody might be online only six months before they actually start buying online.