What are the three main dimensions of organizational structure?
n we are looking at organizations, there are three main structural elements: hierarchy, differentiation and specialization, and formalization. You can devise a plan for changing communication norms with the tips found at FutureTech’s website. On this site, they tell us “Effective employee communication increases productivity, reduces voluntary turnover, and creates a mission-focused workforce.” This is a great reason to understand how hierarchy, differentiation, and specialization can change any group. Each of these plays a role in communications on an organizational level.
|
|
Hierarchy is the way in which power in an organization is delegated. Most larger organizations will have more levels of power than smaller ones. Some organizations are attempting to create less levels of power within their organizations. This would make the organization more nimble and accepting of change. The problem with largely hierarchial organizations lies in the flow of communication. When there are several layers , it is very difficult to get messages sent from the bottom to the top. Some employees say, “communication problems in the company and micromanagement by their boss are intolerable. In response, senior-level management sends its leaders to management training where they learn to listen and communicate more effectively,” A view on this situation is presented by The CEO Refresher.
|
|
The term differentiation and specialization is another way of saying division of labor. As our text explains, “In an entrepreneurial, start-up organization, one or two people may do everything, thus reflecting a low level of specialization or differentiation. However, in large corporations, we typically find a high level of specialization, reflected in departments like production, planning, public relations, and so forth.” Specialization in an organization can be either beneficial or not. Specialization builds ties between people in departments who are both specialized in the same area. They develop a sense of belonging and also develop their own jargon. The building of relationships is good for the organization, but it also separates those groups from the rest of the organization. It is for that reason different departments have a hard time understanding each other and working together. Most of the time, there are actual physical boundaries between departments. Yet all of the separate groups rely on each other to do their part and get what needs to be done, done.
|
|
|
|
Formalization refers to the rules, regulations, and norms of an organization. Communication between members of an organization is typically formalized in some fashion, in some organizations more than others. This causes certain happenings to become ritualistic and members come to expect certain things to happen at certain times. We can all tell a very formal meeting by the way people dress, the actions of people in the meeting, and the format of the meeting itself. Some organizations with formal meeting procedures use a guide such as Roberts Rules of Order. However formal an organization may seem, all organizations started very informally. Microsoft, for example, had its humble beginnings. You can see how organizations grow into the highly formalized corporations they are today.
Although these ways of organizing a group are meant to help a group, they can also harm it in certain ways. There is such a thing as too much structure. This is evident in many religious groups. Organizations need a balance between structure and rigidness. In the text, the authors explain, “In studies of how rumors spread through an organization (as they inevitably will_), management researcher Keith Davis found that the organizations most effective in terms of their formal communication also had healthy patterns for handling informal communication.” This situation of compromise is necessary for a corporation to maintain loyalty and keep turnover rates low. Structure in organizations and communication go hand-in-hand.
FutureTech Consulting, FutureTech, West Conshohocken, PA.
http://www.futuretechconsulting.com/services/empcomm.asp?vSection=services&vSectionLink=empcomm
George Cheney, Lars Thoger Christensen, Theodore E. Zorn, Jr., Shiv Ganesh, Organizational Communication in an Age of Globalization: Issues, Reflections, Practices, Waveland Press, Inc., 2004.
General Henry M. Robert, Roberts Rules of Order, Constitution Society, 1996. http://www.constitution.org/rror/rror--00.htm
Joe DiSabatino and Janet Oliver, The CEO Refresher, Phoenix Consulting Associates, 2001. http://www.refresher.com/_extinct.html
Travis Nichols and David Grote, Microsoft’s History, http://wwwshs1.bham.wednet.edu/curric/socst/wa/Micro.htm